Abyssal_Lord

You want a leaner state that does fewer things well — no state housebuilder, no UBI, no faith that Westminster can fix what it broke. "More government, when they've already proven incompetent" isn't a slogan for you, it's your baseline test for every policy that crosses your path.

You're rarely the outlier — nuclear deterrence, immigration cuts, net zero scepticism, zero tolerance on political violence: on nine of ten votes you sat with the national majority. The one place you broke from it was Starmer's record, where you were firmly in the "no" camp against a country roughly split down the middle.

Croydon South gave you nothing but agreement — on every vote with local data, your area matched you vote for vote, unanimous. It's a strange comfort: you've yet to be tested against your own neighbours.

Ten votes cast, but only two carry a political signal, and entire fault lines — welfare, immigration policy proper, justice, economy — sit untouched. This is a sketch, not a portrait yet; the "Restore" comment and your instinct against LabCon suggest where the fuller picture is heading, but it isn't there yet.

Cast a few more votes on welfare or economy and this stops being a hunch and starts being a record — every vote you add sharpens the line between "usually agrees with Britain" and "has a worldview of his own." Come back next week; you'll be a clearer person by then.