AmyQ

You're not chasing a manifesto — you want housing that serves your own residents, defence that can stand on its own feet, and welfare that isn't punitive for punishment's sake. Your instinct is local first: fix Red Kite's poorly-managed stock before dreaming up new council builds, keep families from being scattered across the county for lack of homes nearby.

You sided with the national majority on most of these votes, but where you broke — against redirecting big housing investment to council-owned homes, against loosening PIP eligibility restrictions the nation wanted tightened — you did it with reasons rooted in what you actually see locally, not reflexive contrarianism.

Here's the striking thing: on vote after vote, your one-person "local area" reads as 0% or 100% yes — you are, quite literally, the only data point Wycombe has given us so far. That's not a pattern yet, it's a placeholder, and it means every fresh vote you cast currently redefines what "your area" looks like.

Ten votes in, you've never touched immigration, health, education, tax and spend more broadly, or the constitution — a striking silence for someone this engaged on housing and defence. Filling in even one of those would sharpen this profile enormously.

This is very much early days — six scored votes is a shape, not a verdict — but the throughline of practical, patch-first thinking is already visible. Vote a few more times and we'll turn this sketch into something sharper, truer, and entirely yours.