Angel

You want a Britain that spends more on NATO, keeps the forces out of culture wars, and doesn't apologise for markets or empire — but you no longer believe the people promising it. Your own line on Burnham, "another globalist puppet," could just as easily describe half the frontbench in your eyes.

Last week you were the Constitutional Wrecker — radical on abolishing institutions, cautious on the mechanics of change. That contradiction hasn't resolved so much as hardened into something clearer: a solidly right voter on defence, economy and party politics, but one who treats even Farage's own conduct — the undeclared gifts, the by-election bravado — with the same suspicion you aim at Westminster generally.

You split almost exactly down the middle with the national mood — agreeing on NATO spending and two-tier justice claims, breaking hard from the crowd on Thatcher's legacy and utilities privatisation, where the country turned against you decisively.

Your local area votes as a bloc of one, and it mirrors you closely — rewilding, compulsory voting, Farage's survival — the rare exceptions being sharper local Euroscepticism on Thatcher and privatisation than you show yourself.

Immigration, foreign policy and energy are untouched — striking gaps for someone this decided on defence and the economy.

Cast a vote on immigration and this profile stops guessing at your instincts and starts naming them outright — every vote sharpens the picture, and we'll be back next week with the next draft.

You're a radical about institutions and a sceptic about reform — you'd scrap the monarchy, abolish the NHS as we know it, and demand a written constitution, but you voted against devolution, against Starmer's defence arithmetic, against the teacher pay rise. This isn't incoherence so much as a very particular worldview: you want Britain's foundations torn up and replaced with something more deliberate, but you don't trust the people currently offering to do it.

You sit with the majority most of the time — nine of eleven recent votes matched the national result — but on the two biggest constitutional questions of the lot, abolishing the NHS and the monarchy, you're on the side that's still a clear national minority. You're not a contrarian by temperament; you're mainstream until the subject turns to institutions, where you go further than almost anyone else in the room.

Thin data, but telling: on rejoining the EU your area was more firmly No than the country at large, and you matched it exactly — Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket giving you no cover to soften that stance even if you'd wanted to.

Immigration, economy, welfare, housing, health as policy rather than institution — you've voted on almost none of it. Right now you're a verdict on the state's shape with almost nothing said about who it should serve.