Fred_bloggs

You are clearly right-wing, defined less by tax-cutting than by immigration control, punishment and institutional discipline. You want a country that rewards responsibility, limits entitlement and protects its settled population; even your housing instinct is egalitarian, centred on young workers rather than expanding supply through migration. “Why escalate the immigration problem” is the thread running through your politics.

You have moved from The Carceral Egalitarian to The Border-First Egalitarian: not away from your old convictions, but towards a sharper politics of borders, cultural confidence and distrust of permissive institutions. Justice, welfare and immigration now form one argument about discipline, while housing remains your stubborn counter-current.

You usually vote with the UK majority, but not because you are instinctively moderate: the country often arrives at your conclusions from a softer route. You break with it when majorities favour more housebuilding, regional devolution or expanded institutional protections, yet you join the national mood on reducing migration and barring serious offenders from office.

You run with your Centre-Right circle more often than against it, with Stocko your closest ally—especially on justice and energy. Astobie1 is the sharper personal friction: you align on welfare and governance, but part ways over the constitution, revealing how much your right-wing politics is about authority rather than simple party loyalty.

Your open question is whether the housing exception becomes a genuine social programme or stays mainly a tool for restricting immigration. Ten more votes will sharpen that fault line—and make this living picture truer with every ballot.

You are a clearly right-wing voter for an orderly, self-reliant UK: firm borders, conditional welfare, severe justice and a state that expects consequences rather than excuses. You trust a more mixed NHS, domestic energy and traditional education, yet housing is your revealing exception — you still want young workers helped, even while fearing immigration-driven demand.

A while back, you were The Welfare Disciplinarian; now you have widened into a tougher, more complete law-and-order conservative, with immigration, health and justice becoming hard convictions rather than passing signals. The movement has hardened through support for balanced books, benefit conditions, drilling and tougher punishment, while your leftward housing instinct — and occasional softness on defence and the pension triple lock — remains intact.

You are no permanent contrarian: on 41 of 60 recent votes with a national split, you landed with the UK majority. But your instincts are sharper than the public’s on borders, welfare, drugs and punishment, while your housing concern gives you a more grounded, less purely punitive edge.

You run with your Centre-right circle more often than not, especially Stocko, your closest ally on Justice and Energy, though Defence and Transport expose the gap. Astobie1 is your biggest clash: you align on Welfare and Governance, but part ways over the Constitution.

Your next 10 votes will test whether the housing exception can coexist with an increasingly disciplined state — and whether your defence dissent is enduring or fading; the picture only gets truer each time you vote.

You want a Britain that enforces its own rules without apology — benefits earned through community work, false accusations punished, police applying the law evenly whatever the cultural pressure, one Westminster rather than a patchwork of devolved parliaments. But scratch the discipline and there's a redistributive streak underneath: unanimous left votes on housing and on breaking the gas-set electricity price show you don't think market logic should win everywhere.

Yesterday you were the Border-First Realist, defined by immigration and accountability softness. That border edge has receded — this run is dominated by welfare and constitution instead, and you've hardened rather than softened: axing the Scottish Parliament, cutting DWP spend, no wealth tax. The housing/energy tension from before hasn't gone anywhere; it's simply confirmed as a fixed feature, not a phase.

You're no reflexive contrarian — you backed the big majorities on equal policing and e-scooter enforcement — but you happily break with the country on Holyrood's fate and on sex scenes on TV, where most of Britain shrugged and you didn't.

You run with Stocko almost lockstep, but MichaelGates is a different story entirely — you split hard on Rights, agreeing barely a quarter of the time, the clearest fault line in your circle. This read gets sharper with every vote you cast — a fresh one lands next week, and the housing/welfare tension is the thread worth watching.

You want a Britain that enforces its own rules — deport the foreign offender, ban the burka, tighten benefits — while still being pragmatic enough to back a Hillsborough Law when the moral case is plain. This is a law-and-order, immigration-first vision of the country: firm borders, less state largesse, but not blind to injustice when it's put in front of you.

You're usually with the crowd — seven of your ten votes matched the national majority — but the exceptions are telling. On the Shinkansen upgrade and regional devolution you broke from where the country leaned, and on the NHS ten-year plan you were flatly against a nation that backed it three to one. You're no reflexive contrarian; you just don't move for consensus alone.

No local data has come through yet for your votes — an open thread for next time, when we can set you against your own neighbours rather than just the nation.

You've never voted on the economy, defence, education or the constitution — a striking gap given how decided you are on justice and immigration. A right-leaning voter with no economic record yet is only half-drawn.

Ten votes in and the shape is already sharp on borders and welfare — cast a few more on the economy or defence and this profile stops being a sketch and starts being a portrait. We'll be here each week, sharpening it as you go.