Gavtheoldgit

You vote for a more disciplined UK: immigration controlled, welfare scrutinised, prisons tougher, schools more basic and defence less dependent on allies. But you are not simply a small-state conservative; you favour a codified constitution and retain a surprisingly left-leaning instinct on some public protections, from rent regulation to social care and water-company accountability.

A while back, you were The Guarded Provider; now the provider has given way to a more settled border-first constitutionalist. Your rightward instincts have hardened on migration, culture, welfare and foreign policy, while your constitutional dissent remains: you want stronger authority, but also clearer limits on it.

You are neither a reliable outsider nor a mirror of the nation, landing with the UK majority about as often as you oppose it. The sharper contrast is where you go against the grain: rejecting foreign-policy independence from the United States, opposing mass council-house building and resisting climate spending, while backing Ukraine and even completing HS2.

Your circle sits around the Centre, but you are only loosely in step with it; agreement is more occasional coalition than shared creed. Your closest ally, chrishaseman, meets you on economy and education, but justice is where the alliance starts to fray.

Your open question is whether constitutional liberty can remain the brake on a politics increasingly defined by borders, punishment and national security. Ten more votes will sharpen that tension and make the picture truer still.

You're not split down the middle so much as sorted by issue: tax the ultra-rich, fund a National Care Service, hand power to the regions — that's the provider in you. But foreign criminals get deported, the burka gets banned, nuclear defence gets built up — that's the guard on the door. You want a state strong enough to protect and generous enough to provide, with little patience for culture-war noise on either side — you turned down both marriage equality and the "trans danger" framing in the same sitting.

You're right there with the country on the big consensus calls — deporting foreign offenders, funding care through general taxation — but you break from the crowd on marriage equality, where you're the exception in a Britain that's moved on almost unanimously. Split down the middle across your ten votes, you're neither the nation's echo nor its outlier — just its awkward, unpredictable cousin.

You run with your circle more often than not — 30hoverspayouts is your steadiest ally, agreeing with you seven times in ten — but Msm barely tracks you at all, agreeing only four times in ten, likely the flashpoint being culture and immigration where your instincts are firmer than theirs.

Ten votes is just the opening sketch — the guard-and-provider pattern is real, but it'll sharpen fast. Every vote you cast from here narrows the picture; come back tomorrow and see who you're becoming.