Jman

You want a Britain that enforces its own rules — tighter PIP awards, harsher sentencing, a deterrent that's genuinely ours — while keeping enough flexibility to back a wealth tax or closer EU ties when the argument is sound rather than tribal. Welfare, defence and justice are where your convictions are hardest; everywhere else you're negotiating case by case.

Last time you were "The Council-Estate Realist" — right-coded but softened by one housing exception. That exception has widened: you're still voting to cut social security and lock down PIP, but you've also swung behind a wealth tax on assets over £10m and closer EU ties, moves your old profile never hinted at. The realism has sharpened into something closer to selective dissent from your own instincts.

You ran with the national majority on most votes this round — nationalising British Steel, scrapping digital ID, backing the Falklands and the nuclear deterrent all put you in the mainstream. Where you split from the country is welfare: Britain wanted problem-solving over benefit cuts, you didn't.

You track your circle only 58% of the time — closer to Chelina, your best ally, though even she parts ways with you on constitutional questions. Andymac, your sharpest clash, splits with you specifically on governance — fitting, since your own votes there (Lords reform, byelections) show you're happy to break from a rightward crowd on how power itself should work.

Seventeen scored votes is still an early sketch, not a verdict — every welfare, justice or economy vote you cast next sharpens whether this is a genuine crossover voter or just noise settling. Come back next week; the picture only gets truer.

You're a straightforward right-leaning voter — tougher sentencing, no let-up on Home Office cooperation, no NI hike to fund an earlier retirement. This is a Britain that enforces its own rules before it rewrites them.

You split evenly with the national mood, six times out of ten, which sounds moderate until you notice which six: you backed judges getting less discretion when most of Britain agreed, but you rejected a junk food ad ban and a social media crackdown that the country narrowly favoured. You're right-wing with a libertarian streak on regulation, not a reflexive contrarian.

Tooting is voting with you almost everywhere — unanimous against the Lewisham raids ban, against the NI rise, against the ad ban — except on housing, where your area backed both council homes and the Strategic Partnership top-up while you voted no to the first and yes to the second. That's the one real seam in your record: a right-leaning voter who still can't quite let go of social housing.

Ten votes and not one on Economy, Defence, Education or Immigration policy beyond raids — for someone this clear on crime and welfare, the absence of a view on tax, spending or the wider economy is the obvious gap to close next.

Eight scored votes is enough to see the shape of you, not the whole picture — cast a few more, especially on the economy and education, and this profile will start telling you things about yourself you haven't noticed yet.