Libertas
13 July 2026 · after 56 votes · current
The Constitutional Enforcer
13 July 2026 · after 56 votes · current
The Constitutional Enforcer
You want a Britain that deports without apology, builds without asking neighbouring councils' permission, and spends on defence and policing before it spends on anything softer — a state that acts first, muscular and unembarrassed, from Shabir Ahmed's deportation to backing Jewish community protection to a hard line on Scotland staying put.
Last week you were the Old-School Conservative, thin and untested at seven votes. Now, across forty, the unanimity hasn't cracked — if anything it's hardened, with housing, constitution and economy your sharpest convictions, the state's authority extended from borders into planning and property itself.
You're not a contrarian by temperament — you sided with the national majority on roughly half your recent votes, happily aboard on NATO spending and Farage's Clacton win. But when the country votes for rent controls, family reunion routes, or proportional representation, you're reliably the no in the room, unmoved by the size of the majority against you.
No local data has landed yet — your area's shape is still invisible, an open question your next votes will start to answer.
You've never touched energy, employment, technology or science — odd gaps for someone this decided on housing and the economy, and the next places your hard-right instincts will get truly tested.
This is only sharper from here — every vote you cast fills in another edge of the picture, and next week's profile will tell you whether that Hillsborough-style break from the crowd was a one-off or the start of a pattern worth naming.
12 July 2026 · after 10 votes
The Old-School Conservative
12 July 2026 · after 10 votes
The Old-School Conservative
Ten votes, seven with a clear political charge, and every one of them pulls the same direction: nuclear deterrent yes, extended childcare no, top-down growth frameworks no, a burka ban yes. This is a Britain you want strong abroad, disciplined at home, and largely left alone by Whitehall's newer instincts — defence-first, welfare-cautious, unsentimental about reform for reform's sake.
You're no outlier — you sided with the national majority on eight of your ten votes, comfortably inside the mainstream on devolution, spatial strategy and the NHS ten-year plan, where most of the country agreed with you that Westminster overreaches. But on the Hillsborough Law, four in five voters backed it and you didn't — a real break, not noise, and worth sitting with: what is it about institutional accountability that gives you pause when everything else about your record says "hold the line"?
No local data has come through yet on your recent votes — your area's voice is still a blank page next to yours.
You've never voted on immigration, the economy, education or energy — categories that would either confirm this hard-right unanimity or complicate it. Right now you're "unanimously right" on a small, defence-and-order sample; the real test comes when tax, migration and public spending show up on the ballot.
This is early days — seven scored votes is a shape, not yet a portrait. Every vote you cast sharpens it, and we'll have a fresh read waiting next week, especially once we see where you land on immigration and the economy.