MarkHolt

You want a Britain where institutions answer to people rather than the other way round: public utilities back in public hands, media ownership scrutinised, workplaces regulated for basic dignity like a legal cap on heat. Yours is a left that trusts collective action — GPs striking, government spending on heat adaptation — but doesn't romanticise disorder; you rejected the idea that left-wing violence is "inherent" while still willing to say the right has a violence problem.

You're strikingly unrebellious for a clear leftist — you agreed with the national majority on 17 of 19 votes, from Iran's IRGC designation to more bank holidays. Your real breaks from consensus are narrow but telling: you backed rejoining the EU against a country still saying no, and you called the Widdecombe-murder terrorism framing overblown when most of Britain disagreed.

No local data has come through yet on your votes — an open thread rather than a verdict. Your area's voice is still missing from this picture.

You've built a clear governance-and-rights identity from a strikingly narrow base — welfare, housing, justice, education, energy, culture: all untouched. For someone this decided on how power and money should be shared, never voting on welfare or housing is the loudest silence in your record.

This is early days — fourteen scored votes is a sketch, not a portrait. Vote on housing or welfare next and watch this profile sharpen into something no one else's record could produce.