PhilipHarris

You want a Britain that spends less on universal welfare, builds its nuclear deterrent without apology, and clears the courts of judicial review so the diggers can start moving — a state that does less, but does it faster. Yet you're no centraliser: you voted for regional assemblies and for a National Care Service to stay out of general taxation, splitting your instincts between a leaner Whitehall and a devolved one.

You mostly ride with the herd — seven of your ten votes landed with the national majority — but your two breaks are pointed. Britain voted overwhelmingly to give teenagers the meningitis B jab; you voted no. The country wants a taxpayer-funded National Care Service; you don't. Those aren't drift, they're conviction against comfortable consensus.

Ten votes cast, but whole continents of British politics — immigration, justice, education, foreign policy — remain untouched. A right-leaning profile with nothing yet said on borders or crime is a profile only half-drawn.

Six scored votes is a sketch, not a portrait — sharp already, legendary in how distinctive it reads, but every vote you cast redraws the line a little truer. Fill in justice or immigration next and we'll see if the hardliner holds or splits again.