Rogerbox

You want a Britain that redistributes hard — a National Care Service funded from general taxation, no shrinking the state into benefits paid back through income tax, a trillion in one man's hands offends you — but you want that Britain governed from the centre, not carved into assemblies or handed to Andy Burnham. Old Labour instincts, not new localism.

You split almost evenly with the country, but the shape of your dissent matters more than the score: you sided with big majorities on deporting foreign offenders and funding social care, yet stood against 81% of the country on marriage equality and against 71% on merging tax and welfare — a voter who agrees with Britain on redistribution and disagrees with it on identity.

With pchallinor you're near lockstep — 93%, built on shared ground on rights — but Samantha is your mirror-opposite, and it's Constitution and Rights, the exact fault line running through your own record, where you two come apart. You're not simply running with the pack; on this evidence you're arguing with your own side as much as the other.

Seventeen scored votes is enough to see the shape, not the whole picture — the tension between your economic radicalism and your constitutional conservatism is the thread worth watching. Vote again and this read gets sharper every week, not vaguer.