Rosscoe

You want a Britain that draws hard lines on immigration and deportation — Shabir Ahmed, foreign offenders, refugee reunion routes all voted down or out — but you're no small-state purist: you funded 500 more police for Jewish communities and backed a full NHS reform plan without hesitation. This is a security-first Britain, not a laissez-faire one.

You mostly ride with the crowd — deportation after any imprisonable offence, the Shabir Ahmed law change, the NHS plan — all comfortable majorities you shared. But you split hard from the nation twice: you opposed the burka ban that two-thirds of Britain wanted, and you rejected refugee family reunion when the country was already near-unanimous against it, just from the other direction — you're stricter than most, not looser.

No local data has come through yet on your votes — an open question for now, not a verdict.

Justice and rights sit unresolved in your record — genuinely split, not yet settled — and huge tracts of the map are untouched: no votes on housing, economy, defence, education, energy. For someone this decided on borders, it's odd you haven't weighed in on the economy that pays for enforcing them.

Eight scored votes is enough to sketch a silhouette, not a full portrait — cast a few more, especially in justice or the economy, and this read will sharpen into something unmistakably yours. We'll be watching, and rewriting, every week.