Stairhopper

You vote like someone building a Britain worth defending: strongly left on justice, unanimously left on health, energy and the environment, keen on capping political donations and taxing AI job-replacement. But the moment the conversation turns to who gets in, you swing hard right — tougher net migration controls, Brexit reaffirmed, scepticism that indigenous concerns have ever really been heard. Yours is a vision of a fairer, more equal Britain, just one with the gates firmly manned.

You're not a rebel by nature — you sided with the national majority on 21 of your 30 recent votes, from capping industrial electricity prices to opposing a rushed pharma fast-track. But you break decisively from the pack on the indigenous-concerns question, where the country voted 16% yes and you voted no — a minority stance you clearly hold with conviction, not accident.

Wolverhampton North East mirrors you almost eerily — 100% agreement on Rupert Lowe over Farage, on donation caps, on tighter migration rules — but splits from you on Andy Burnham's premiership and Starmer's resignation, where your area went one way and you the other. It's a rare case of a voter and their patch nearly fused, save a few sharp local disagreements on Westminster psychodrama.

You've never voted on welfare, housing, defence or the triple lock — odd for someone this fluent on economy and justice. Fill in welfare and you'll settle whether your left instincts extend to the safety net, or stop at the border.

This is early days — 23 scored votes is a shape, not yet a portrait. Vote on housing or defence next and watch this profile sharpen into something unmistakably yours; every ballot you cast rewrites the read.