Sun_tzu

You're voting for a country that trusts individuals over institutions and orthodoxies over crackdowns — scrap the crown, rejoin Europe, legalise cannabis, keep human rights law intact. It's a quietly liberal, live-and-let-live vision, not a loud one.

You split evenly with the national mood, five votes for, five against — but the disagreements aren't random. You went against the grain on nuclear disarmament, on treating a murder as terrorism, and most tellingly on the burka ban, where you sided with the minority defending the right to wear it while six in ten of the country wanted it gone.

Only one of your ten votes has registered a clear political signal so far — your unanimous, unambiguous left lean on the burka question. It's a small sample, but it's not nothing: it's the one moment the system caught you defending a minority right against a comfortable majority.

You've cast votes on justice, health and rights-adjacent questions, but whole territories — economy, immigration, welfare, housing, defence policy proper — are untouched. Right now this profile is a sketch of instincts, not yet a worldview with edges.

Ten votes in and you're already showing a consistent grain — cast a few more on economy or immigration and this stops being a guess and starts being a verdict. Every vote you make from here sharpens the picture; come back next week and we'll show you how much truer it's got.