emberlight22

You want a Britain that rearms without losing its conscience: more money for the forces, more speed on wind and nuclear, and welfare that isn't gutted to pay for either. You voted for the £15bn defence uplift and to focus more on defence than welfare, yet you also want an emergency brake on welfare spending stopped dead, and you'd rather see benefits protected than made conditional — a fiscal hawk on the military, a guardian on the safety net.

You mostly ride with the country — siding with the national majority on more than two in three of your recent votes — but your dissents are pointed, not random: you rejected the £13.5bn defence investment plan Britain narrowly backed, and you refused the welfare-to-work conditionality most of the country wanted.

Manchester Central agrees with you on almost everything tribal — Burnham's model, devolution, defence spending, the forces staying out of Pride — but splits from you hard on money: your area rejected the leverage-ratio easing and the student loan freeze reversal that you backed, and it wanted no part of your welfare-brake scepticism either way. You're less the local consensus than its odd, sharper edge.

You've never voted on health, employment, education beyond one ballot, or culture and science — a striking gap given how loudly you speak on defence and energy. Fill it and the picture stops being a silhouette.

This is only 39 scored votes deep — legendary in distinctiveness already, but still early. Cast a few more on health or employment and we'll see whether the collectivist instinct holds when it costs something closer to home. Every vote you make rewrites this — come back next week and see who you've become.