fenlandfrank

You're a welfare-first Britain builder: scrap the two-child cap, keep the triple lock, fund UBI trials, tax the financial sector's grip on the economy — but you're not soft on everything, backing the £15bn defence boost and faster planning reform without blinking. Yours is a Britain that protects its own first — pensioners, families, the NHS — while still wanting the state to build and defend.

You split almost evenly with the national mood — siding with the majority on planning reform and defence spending, but breaking from it hard on utilities privatisation (the country says it's failed; you say no) and on scrapping the triple lock, where you held firm against a nation ready to let it go.

Boston and Skegness mostly walks with you — unanimous on planning, Gaza, obesity funding, defence — but splits from you sharply on the two-child cap and the triple lock, where your area actually leaned the other way. That's your real tension: a leftish welfare instinct sitting inside a town that isn't always with you on welfare specifics.

Seventeen scored votes across just three real categories is a thin base — you've never voted on immigration, housing, justice or education, the very terrain where a "welfare first" identity usually gets tested hardest.

This is early days — cast a few votes on immigration or housing and the picture sharpens fast, showing whether your protective instinct holds when the argument gets less comfortable. Every vote you make from here rewrites this profile a little truer.