half_pint_harry

You want a Britain that redistributes power and wealth — public control of Thames Water, a federal UK, London's grip loosened — but you won't romanticise the people asking for help: student debt relief and unconditional welfare both got a NO from you. Yours is an equality project built on structural change, not sentiment.

You split almost evenly with the national mood, agreeing on half your recent votes and breaking on the rest — no herd instinct either way. The clearest break: most of Britain wanted the state to invest more in subsea cable jobs and back the transatlantic relationship; you voted NO to both, unmoved by conventional wisdom on infrastructure and alliances.

Brigg and Immingham is usually where you land — on the Manchester Treasury unit, the federation vote, the Thames Water nationalisation, you and your area moved together. The exception is telling: your area rejected student loan reform and welfare conditionality reversals harder than you did, showing you're a touch softer on individual hardship than your neighbours.

You've never voted on Defence, Employment, Technology or Agriculture — big gaps for someone this decided on energy and welfare. A vote on any of these would sharpen a profile that's currently strong on principle but untested on the practical machinery of the state.

This is early-days data — 39 scored votes is a real shape, not a sketch, but it firms up every time you vote. Cast a few more on defence or employment and we'll tell you, next week, exactly how the Rewired Egalitarian is holding up.