jamieamartin1

You're a devolution-first leftist who breaks hard right the moment defence enters the room — backing Burnham's regional power grab and Miliband's exile in the same breath as demanding more money for tanks and welfare-to-work conditionality. It's a coherent vision, just not the one either tribe expects: a Britain that trusts the regions but not the peace dividend.

You're broadly in step with the country's instinct on defence — you voted with the 86% who want spending up to meet "the Moscow test" — but you're out on a limb on welfare-versus-defence trade-offs where you sided with a smaller, harder-edged majority, and you rejected NHS abolition only after most of Britain had already said no far more emphatically.

Chingford and Woodford Green backed you almost everywhere — unanimous on regional power, hybrid warships, defence spending — bar one moment: your area saw Russia as more than a paper tiger while you called its bluff, a rare local break.

Thirteen votes and not one on immigration, housing, health or crime — for someone this decided on power and defence, the domestic policy floor is still unmapped.

Seven scored votes is a sketch, not a portrait — vote on health, housing or immigration next and this profile will start telling you things about yourself you haven't said out loud yet. Every vote you cast sharpens the picture; come back next week and see what's changed.