lauren.hewson

You want a Britain that keeps its economic engine running hard — business gets a clean unanimous right-lean from you, Reform gets called a danger, and you'd still vote Brexit today — while insisting the gains get shared. You voted that the financial sector has too much control, that the richest have more than their fair share, and against CEOs pocketing hundreds of times their workers' pay. This isn't muddled centrism; it's a specific bet that markets and fairness aren't opposites, they're a package deal.

You split almost exactly down the middle with the national mood — 17 of 30 votes landed with the majority, 13 against. You broke hard from the country on Utilities privatisation (72% said it failed; you said no) and on the £15bn defence uplift (63% yes; you said no) — a genuinely independent read on two totemic issues.

Ladywood, though, you barely ever leave. From backing Burnham as an effective PM to calling Farage toast, you tracked your area's majority on nearly every vote where it had one — a rare case of a voter more in step with their street than with the country at large.

You've never voted on health, energy, or crime-adjacent policy beyond the death penalty and PIP — big absences for someone this decided on economics and education. Technology and culture are untouched too, odd given how firmly right you land on business and immigration.

Early days at 30 scored votes, but the shape is already sharp: a business-right, fairness-left voter who owes the country nothing more than her own arithmetic. Cast a few votes in health or energy and we'll see whether that same instinct — market discipline, shared reward — holds. Every vote you cast sharpens this; check back next week.