leannebramley96

You want a Britain that redistributes wealth without pretending the political class deserves your trust to manage it — richest have too much, workers deserve more, but Labour gets called a "threat to the UK" in the same breath. Yours is a left economics wrapped in a hard shell of institutional suspicion.

You split almost evenly with the nation — siding with the majority barely half the time — because your left instincts on wealth and welfare keep colliding with a harder line on parties, immigration integration tests, and defence spending the country itself mostly backs. You're rarely the outlier; you're just unpredictable.

Grimsby and Cleethorpes usually has your back — you're aligned with local opinion more often than not, from cutting non-British sentencing premiums to keeping the Barnett formula untouched. Where you diverge locally is telling: your area voted heavily against Trump-as-democracy's-death-knell alongside you, but split from you on defence cuts and hybrid warships, suggesting your area is more security-minded than you are.

You've never voted on energy, employment, transport, food or foreign policy — odd gaps for someone this engaged with economic justice, and the kind of terrain where your redistributive instincts would sharpen fastest.

This is early days — 41 scored votes is enough to see the shape, not the whole picture. Cast a few more, especially where you've gone quiet, and next week's read gets sharper still.