lou_makes_tea

You want a Britain that taxes inequality down, scraps the two-child cap, and hands power out of Whitehall to places like Manchester — but you want it paid for by growth and industry, not green subsidy. You're strongly left on welfare and the environment in principle, yet you voted against household solar subsidies and a climate security taskforce, and called the Green Party a danger. This isn't confusion — it's a worker's environmentalism, suspicious of costs landing on ordinary bills while cheering deforestation rules on big importers instead.

You break from the national majority more often than not — on Gibraltar's Schengen deal, on the forced-adoption apology, on non-British sentencing, you went your own way while most of Britain voted the other direction. This isn't reflexive dissent; it's a genuinely mixed portfolio, right on energy and economy, left on welfare and housing, refusing to sort neatly into either tribe's checklist.

Manchester Central mostly backs you up — unanimous on tightening foreign donation rules, on scrapping the two-child cap, on Burnham's Whitehall power grab. You're a fairly representative voice of your city's left-leaning instincts, even where you personally veer rightward on energy.

You've never voted on health, employment, technology or foreign policy — a striking gap for a 21-year-old in part-time work in a city built on services and devolution debates. Your next votes there could either confirm this centrist-left shape or scramble it entirely. This is week one — the sketch is real but thin. Cast a few more votes, especially in those gaps, and next week's profile will know you sharper.