marigold_jones

You want a Britain that looks after its own — welfare, education, immigration and rights all pull firmly left for you, from opposing ILR integration tests to backing a social media ban to protect people. But your convictions on Governance sit hard right: you don't trust the institutions meant to deliver that fairness, voting no on Ed Miliband as chancellor, no on Burnham's 10-year plan, sceptical of the very establishment your economics would need.

You split from the national mood almost exactly half the time, and rarely by accident. Britain backs Ukraine support and higher defence spending by wide margins; you voted no on both, and unanimously left on Defence overall — a dovish streak that puts you at odds with a country moving hawkish.

Grimsby and Cleethorpes tracks you loosely, agreeing as often as it disagrees. Your area was unanimous that Flood Re should cap payouts for the wealthy — you agreed — but split from you hard on Burnham's plan, where your patch rejected it entirely while the nation was still divided.

You've never voted on Health, Employment or Crime — for someone this decided on welfare and education, that's a real gap in the picture of the state you want.

Forty-four scored votes has already given you a sharp, contradictory shape — left on people, right on power. Cast a few more on health and employment and this profile stops being a sketch and starts being unmistakably yours.