pigeonfancier64

You want a leaner, harder-edged Britain on money — no cliff-edge benefit fixes, no UBI, no scrapping the two-child cap, VAT relief pared back on Motability leases — but you flinch when rights are in play, backing equality and a ban on social media over free-for-all platforms. This isn't confusion; it's a voter who separates "who pays" from "who's protected."

You split almost evenly with the national mood — on your side for 14 of 22 votes — but your disagreements aren't random: you broke hard against the country on UBI, on Burnham's growth plan, and on scrapping the child benefit cap, each time pulling right where Britain leaned soft.

Ashfield mostly walks with you — unanimous against devolving more power to mayors, unanimous against the housing benefit fix — but you're pulling ahead of it on rights: you backed lowering inequality and distrust of right-wing media where your own area agreed unanimously too, suggesting this is a fairly settled local consensus you're simply riding.

Fifteen scored votes is a start, not a verdict — you've never touched immigration, justice, housing or education, the very terrain where a right-leaning economic view usually meets its sharpest tests.

This is early days: cast a few votes on immigration or justice and the picture sharpens from a sketch into a real portrait — come back next week and we'll show you exactly how you've moved.