UK plans law change to deport Rochdale grooming gang ringleader

The news

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood will set out on Monday the legal steps to deport Shabir Ahmed, the ringleader of the Rochdale grooming gang. Ahmed was jailed for 22 years in 2012 for child sexual offences, stripped of British citizenship, and released on licence this month. A 55-year-old law in the Immigration Act prevents his removal because he is a Commonwealth citizen who arrived in the UK before 1973 and had lived here for five years. The government believes it has found a way to close the loophole without affecting the right to remain of other Commonwealth citizens, including the Windrush generation. Pakistan has refused to accept Ahmed because he renounced his Pakistani citizenship.

What's at stake

The 1971 law bars deportation of a small group of long-term Commonwealth arrivals. Changing it would allow the removal of Ahmed, who is subject to strict licence conditions including exclusion zones, an electronically monitored curfew and the sex offenders register. Any breach would see him returned to prison immediately. The Home Office has told victims he cannot currently be sent to Pakistan. Government sources say the domestic legal fix is ready but success ultimately depends on Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office negotiations with Pakistan. The case has triggered calls across the political spectrum for deportation of serious offenders who have lost British citizenship.

The case for

Deporting serious foreign offenders protects the public and upholds justice. Ahmed was convicted of multiple child sexual offences and his victims were informed on release that the 1971 law blocked removal. Removing him would ensure he cannot reoffend in the UK while on licence. Comparable countries routinely deport non-citizens convicted of grave crimes after they have served their sentences. The government argues a targeted change can achieve this outcome without wider impact on other long-term residents.

The case against

Changing a longstanding law risks unfair precedents and diplomatic complications. The 1971 Immigration Act has protected Commonwealth citizens resident for decades, and altering it could unsettle legal expectations for others in similar positions. Pakistan has already refused to take Ahmed and two fellow ringleaders because they renounced Pakistani citizenship, meaning a legal change might not secure actual removal. Negotiations with the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office could drag on for months or longer. A rushed amendment might create future legal challenges or affect broader immigration policy stability.

Why it matters now

If the law changes and Pakistan agrees to accept him, Ahmed could be deported within months rather than remaining in the UK under licence conditions. If the plan stalls, he will continue to live here under strict monitoring with the threat of immediate recall to prison for any breach. The home secretary's statement on Monday will set the timetable for any legislation. How quickly the government can resolve the diplomatic side with Pakistan will determine whether the move delivers the outcome victims and politicians have demanded.

Further reading

BBC News · The Guardian

Have your say

This is a live referendum on refnation. Cast your vote →

Want to follow more questions like this? Sign in or create an account.