Alexmunn

You are a centre-right voter whose politics begin with ownership and public value. You oppose a wealth tax, distrust rent-control promises, back lower friction for earners and want housing policy judged by whether it delivers durable homes rather than fashionable fixes. Your instinct is not for a smaller state at any price, but for a state that spends less theatrically and expects more in return. That explains the pairing running through your record: firm on immigration, justice and institutional authority, restrained on military power and receptive to welfare support. “Get out of university and get real jobs” is blunt, but it captures your suspicion of status industries detached from practical value.

From The Work-and-Borders Conservative, you now read more as a property-and-tax centre-right voter: economy crossed from Centre Right into Right, while rights moved back into Centre Right.

The week of 2026-W30 placed your votes in the Centre, a useful waypoint in a record that is more mixed than your overall label suggests. Your vote against compulsory community service for litterers on 27 August was a genuine break with the UK: 88% voted the other way, revealing that your instinct for accountability is not simply an appetite for punishment.

You split with the UK almost as often as you join it. The clearest recent departures were rejecting a wealth tax, extended HS2 and “rejoin” politics, alongside backing a ban on Notting Hill Carnival and replacement human-rights arrangements; the country’s majority went the other way on several of those questions. Your dissent is practical and sovereignty-minded, not performative.

You are near the Centre-Right centre of your circle, agreeing with osiris most often on justice and immigration, while parting company on defence and education.

Twenty-four more votes will test whether the property-and-tax thread becomes your defining politics; each ballot makes the picture truer.

You want a country that rewards work, controls its borders and treats crime with consequences: a practical centre-right vision built around effort, authority and national self-confidence. Your own phrase about people leaving university to “get real jobs” captures the mood, though your record also backs universal school meals, welfare protection and restraint on banning NHS strikes.

The Welfare Conservative has become The Work-and-Borders Conservative: still clearly left on welfare and defence, though newly sharper on the economy and justice, and further right on immigration and the constitution. The change is an emphasis, not a reinvention — accountability now sits more firmly at the centre of your politics.

You are neither a habitual outsider nor a simple majority voter: your record is about evenly divided against the nation’s prevailing view. You went against the UK on equal employment support for older unemployed workers and on free school meals, revealing a harder view of work incentives alongside a generous view of basic provision.

You run with your Centre-Right circle more often than not, though not in lockstep. Osiris is your closest ally on justice and immigration; you part ways on defence and the economy, where your instincts are less predictable than your shared law-and-borders outlook.

Your next ten votes will show whether the new work-and-borders emphasis hardens, or whether your older welfare-and-defence instincts reassert themselves; every vote makes this living picture truer.

You want a firmer, more self-governing UK: stricter on immigration, tougher on responsibility and sceptical of fashionable institutional solutions, but not a small-state zealot. Your politics are an unusual bargain between enforcement and protection — you resist extra defence spending, oppose abolishing in-work benefits, and reject abolishing inheritance tax, while backing benefit restrictions and stronger controls on settlement; as you put it, people should “get real jobs”.

You have moved on from The Practical Energy Conservative into a more recognisable Welfare Conservative: still centre-right, but sharper on rights, immigration and constitutional control, while your left-leaning welfare conscience remains intact. The newer record also confirms a restrained foreign-policy instinct — including calling Gaza genocide and worrying about escalation with Russia — rather than turning you into a conventional security hawk.

You are neither a reliable majoritarian nor a permanent dissenter, landing with the UK about as often as you oppose it. Your sharpest break with the national mood is moral rather than economic: you join the country on immigration and cultural questions, yet stand against its welfare-braking instinct and remain wary of military overreach.

You run with your Centre-Right circle, but not in lockstep: osiris is your closest ally, especially on justice and health, while defence and foreign policy are where the friendship parts company. Your loyalty is to your own practical mixture — harder borders, a more accountable state, and a social floor that your wider crowd may be quicker to trim.

The whole record now makes that tension visible; your next ten votes will show whether compassion and restraint keep checking the harder edge, sharpening this living read with every choice.

You want a more self-reliant UK: tougher on energy, borders and institutional accountability, but less eager to spend, punish or deploy force for its own sake. Your politics are economically and constitutionally right-leaning, yet you resist the full conservative package—backing social-care protection, scrapping the two-child cap, rejecting extra defence spending and opposing the deportation of every newly arrived offender. “Get real jobs” captures your instinct for practicality, but your record is less hard-edged than your cultural opinions suggest.

A while back, you were The Sceptical Traditionalist: wary of consensus and centralising fixes, but still only lightly sketched. You have become a clearer centre-right voter—especially on energy, constitutional authority and public accountability—while preserving a genuine softness on welfare and a distinctly non-hawkish view of defence.

You are not a tribal majority voter: across the recent record, you have landed with the UK about as often as against it. You often resist the fashionable or expansive answer—net zero targets, higher-rate tax relief, proportional representation and stronger defence spending—but sometimes break with your side on social protection and military restraint.

Your circle is also centre-right, but you run slightly ahead of its consensus rather than in lockstep, agreeing on shared votes a little over half the time. With no named closest ally or clash, the clearest gap is your combination of harder energy politics and softer welfare instincts.

Your open question is whether this becomes a settled “practical conservative” worldview or a sharper split between economic discipline and social protection. Ten more votes will test that fault line—and make the picture truer.

You want a Britain that slows down before it rebuilds — sceptical of judicial reviews being fast-tracked away, sceptical of new regional assemblies, sceptical of an AI data centre landing on your doorstep for "jobs." Yours is a vision of caution: change should earn its place, not be waved through because it's fashionable.

On four of your ten votes the country went one way and you went the other — most strikingly on speeding up planning reviews, where 80% of Britain said yes and you said no. You're not a contrarian by design; you simply don't trust the machinery being rushed, whether it's courts, devolution, or the electricity grid.

No local data has landed yet on any of your votes — an early gap in the picture. Once your area starts showing splits, we'll be able to tell you whether your scepticism is a local mood or a lonely stance.

You've cast opinions on football finance and AI-driven robots but never once voted on welfare, immigration, health, or justice — the bread-and-butter fault lines of British politics remain untouched, and a right lean built on four scored votes is still early days.

This is just the opening sketch — four scored votes is a shape, not a portrait. Vote on welfare or immigration next and the picture sharpens fast; every ballot you cast from here rewrites this profile a little truer.