AshKillon
30 July 2026 · after 42 votes · current
The Fortress Welfarist
30 July 2026 · after 42 votes · current
The Fortress Welfarist
You want a Britain that rearms, deports foreign offenders fast, brings back the death penalty for the worst crimes and keeps the burka off the streets — but not a Britain that abandons its own. You'd fund a National Care Service from general taxation, keep the triple lock, and refuse to merge welfare into the tax system. Tough at the border, soft at the bedside.
Last time you were the Union Hawk — thin data, ten votes, a hunch about a welfare exception. That exception has held and grown: you've since defended the triple lock, opposed folding benefits into income tax, and backed the care service by a landslide margin. You haven't drifted right or left — you've sharpened into someone who separates "welfare for scroungers" from "welfare for the vulnerable," and means it.
You're rarely an outlier — with the country on 33 of 42 recent calls, from North Sea drilling to deporting foreign offenders. Your breaks are pointed: you'd ban transgender-affirming policy where most voters wouldn't, and you back capital punishment where the nation is split.
Gastfo is your true north, 76% in step, especially on constitutional questions. CarmineClouds is the opposite pole — only 29% agreement, splitting hardest on rights and defence, the two subjects you feel most strongly about.
This is still an early sketch of a clear pattern — cast a few more votes and I'll tell you, next week, whether the Fortress holds or the Welfarist wins out.
26 July 2026 · after 10 votes
The Union Hawk
26 July 2026 · after 10 votes
The Union Hawk
You want a Britain that arms up, holds itself together, and comes down hard on those who abuse it — deport the criminal, ban the burka, keep Scotland in and Westminster whole. Yet you backed a taxpayer-funded National Care Service, which tells us your right-wing instincts are about order and nation, not a reflexive shrinking of the state.
You're not a reliable outlier or a crowd-follower — you sided with the national majority on 6 of your 10 votes, breaking hardest on transgenderism and the trillion-pound fortune, where most of the country went the other way and you didn't follow.
You run close with Griffithsp, in step nine times out of ten on constitutional questions — your instinct for the Union clearly isn't yours alone. CarmineClouds is the opposite story: barely three in ten agreements, and Constitution is exactly where you two split, suggesting your circle isn't as united on the Union as it looks from outside.
Ten votes is enough to sketch the shape of you — hawkish, unionist, unyielding on crime — but not yet enough to call the whole picture. Cast a few more, especially on welfare and economy, and next week's read will start telling you things you don't already suspect about yourself.