DavidCrosby

Your politics are expansive on rights, immigration, welfare and the economy, with renewable energy and defence restraint forming the less conventional centre of gravity. You also want public systems to be selective and disciplined: your record turns right on health and education, and often asks whether universal provision is genuinely worth the cost.

You have moved from The Ecological Disarmament Heretic into a broader left-wing sceptic of state overreach: Justice crossed from Centre Right into Centre Left, while Education crossed from Centre Right into Right. Recent votes also placed you firmly against reducing immigration, replacing human-rights treaties, and rejoining the EU—an unusually clear mix of social openness and national caution.

You are almost exactly a half-against-the-grain voter: the UK majority has backed you on only about half of the recent questions with a clear split. You stood apart most visibly on immigration, refugee protections and human-rights safeguards, though the nation sometimes met you on rehabilitation and renewable investment.

You run with your Centre-Left circle more often than not, but not in lockstep. MCY1X is your closest ally on immigration and defence; health and education are where that alliance becomes a real argument rather than a comfortable echo.

The whole record now shows a settled social vision, with your open question being how far its generosity should extend in schools, healthcare and infrastructure. Sixteen more votes earn the next read—and each one will make the balance between solidarity, standards and restraint more exact.

You vote for a more generous, rights-conscious and environmentally serious UK: protective of migrants, welfare, public ownership and constitutional reform, but wary of punishment politics and military power. The intriguing exception is your rightward instinct on transport, justice and a handful of institutions — proof that your leftism is principled, not automatic.

You have moved from The Ballot-Box Disarmament Heretic to a broader democratic left dissenter: still anti-militarist at the core, but now sharper on immigration and more willing to impose standards on public life. Your transport-and-order edge remains real, though it has not yet become a settled doctrine.

You often vote against the national grain, especially on welfare, asylum, rights and the monarchy, while the country is more comfortable with restrictions and traditional authority. Yet you are not simply oppositional: you joined the majority on inheritance tax abolition and criminal disqualification for MPs, showing that your egalitarianism can coexist with a stern demand for accountability.

Your Centre-Left circle is broadly your political home, but you sit further left and with stronger convictions than its average member. MCY1X is your closest ally — lockstep on defence and immigration, but divided on economy and foreign policy — a useful mirror of how your humanitarian instincts do not always travel with your economic ones.

Your next ten votes will show whether the rightward transport-and-justice thread is becoming a second doctrine or staying an exception; every ballot sharpens the picture, and the next read will make it truer still.

You want a more equal, rights-protecting UK: stronger welfare, public ownership, proportional representation and a less punitive approach to migrants and prisoners. Your deepest instinct is democratic and anti-militarist, but not pacifist in every circumstance—you backed more Ukrainian drones while resisting a permanent expansion of military spending; even your rightward streak on transport, justice and education feels like practical discipline rather than a different worldview.

A while back, you were The Constitutional Pacifist; now you are a more combative democratic leftist, with welfare and immigration convictions pushed further left. You have softened from hard-left on rights, edged right on justice, and arrived at a more uncertain constitutional position—but the anti-military core still holds.

You often vote against the national mood, especially when majorities favour tougher borders, compulsory work, religious restrictions or harsher punishment. Yet you are not reflexively oppositional: you joined the country on practical reforms and backed a whole-life order for police killers, revealing a harder edge beneath the social liberalism.

Your Centre-Left circle is familiar territory, but you are not simply following its script: you agree with it more often than not, while your closest ally MCY1X meets you most clearly on personnel and welfare and parts company on justice. Your distinctive position is a left-wing commitment to institutions that protect people, not merely institutions that punish them.

Your open question is whether the right-leaning exceptions—transport, justice and education—become a coherent law-and-order pragmatism or remain isolated heresies; ten more votes will refresh the read, and every vote makes the picture truer.

You want a more generous, rights-protecting UK: comfortable with redistribution, sceptical of punitive welfare and hostile to anti-migrant politics, but wary of military escalation and cultural panic. Your unusual edge is constitutional restraint — a strong Unionist streak and deep suspicion of firearms, border militarisation and leaving the ECHR — even while you turn unexpectedly right on transport, education and the machinery of the state.

You have not abandoned The Unionist Disarmamentist; you have sharpened it into The Constitutional Pacifist. The latest votes reinforce the anti-militarism — choosing climate adaptation over a larger defence budget and rejecting armed forces at borders — while your refusal to reverse international student fees and your continued resistance to an ECHR exit keep the wider doctrine intact.

You are roughly as likely to defy the UK majority as join it, but your dissent is principled rather than performative: you resist the popular turn towards deportation, migration caps, firearms and harsher policing. The tension is that you can side with the nation on prioritising homeless citizens over illegal migrants, even as you reject the broader politics that frames migration as the central national threat.

You run with a Centre-Left crowd, agreeing with them more often than not, but you are not merely following its script. Cathryn is your closest ally, especially on foreign policy and energy; you part ways on health and transport, revealing the practical, systems-minded streak beneath your internationalist leftism.

Your next ten votes may show whether constitutional restraint becomes a settled doctrine or remains the counterweight to your left internationalism. Keep voting: the picture sharpens with every ballot, and ten more will unlock a fresher, truer read.

You want a solidaristic UK: generous on welfare, open on immigration, protective of rights and willing to tax power — but not culturally coercive or militarily grandiose. Your unusual edge is constitutional: you defend the Union and reject regional devolution while opposing more defence spending, tighter borders and the politics of cultural protection; even your support for Scotland remaining in the UK sits beside a refusal to build a more centralised security state.

You have moved from The Anti-Imperial Unionist to a more fully formed Unionist Disarmamentist: the internationalism remains, but your recent votes sharpen the refusal of migration caps, welfare cuts and “protective” cultural restriction. You are holding steady rather than changing sides — becoming clearer that solidarity, not nationalism, is your answer to national strain.

You are about as likely to resist the UK majority as follow it, but the gap is ideological rather than performative: you repeatedly stand against cutting benefits, deportation and anti-immigration remedies. Your sharpest contradiction is that this deeply left voter turns right on constitutional restraint, education standards and transport — sceptical of both culture-war enforcement and fashionable state expansion.

You run with a Centre-Left circle, but not in lockstep. Cathryn is your closest ally, especially on foreign policy and energy; you part ways on health and transport, where your more disciplinarian instincts show. Your loyalties are therefore issue-by-issue: internationalist solidarity binds you more tightly than a shared position on the machinery of government.

Your next ten votes will test whether constitutional restraint can coexist with your expansive welfare and rights politics — and whether your anti-militarism stays absolute when security questions become more immediate. Keep voting: this profile sharpens with every choice, and the picture gets truer each time.

You want a generous, pluralist UK: stronger on welfare, housing, equality and migrant rights, but wary of militarism and suspicious of easy nationalist explanations. Your signature tension is constitutional rather than cultural: you resist English devolution and favour a settled Union, while voting for an independent foreign policy and against higher defence spending.

You were The Constitutional Internationalist; you are now a sharper anti-imperial Unionist, holding the same welfare-first instincts but making the constitutional contradiction more visible. Recent votes against deportation, migrant property restrictions and religious-school funding show your borders-and-rights position has not softened, while rejecting the claim that society is “irreversibly destroyed” keeps your politics notably less apocalyptic.

You are no reliable mirror of the national mood: across the recent record, you have been with the UK about as often as against it. The country repeatedly chose tougher answers on migration, foreign prisoners and community tensions, while you kept choosing solidarity, evidence and social provision—though you occasionally join the public in wanting visible order, as with the vape-shop vote.

You run with your Centre-Left circle more often than not, but not in lockstep; Cathryn is your closest ally, especially on foreign policy and energy, while health and transport expose the fault lines. Your shared instinct is internationalist, yet your constitutional Unionism and selective appetite for discipline make you less conventionally left than your welfare record suggests.

The open question is whether your anti-imperialism can coexist with your occasional rightward instincts on justice, education and transport; ten more votes will show whether that tension deepens or resolves. This profile sharpens every time you vote, and the next ten will make the picture truer still.

You want a more protective, egalitarian UK: council homes, stronger social provision, equal treatment and a humane immigration system, backed by an independent foreign policy rather than automatic deference to Washington. Yet you are no soft-touch romantic: you reject early prison release, favour tougher standards in education and transport, and believe the Union and its rules matter. Your sharpest signature is that your internationalism is pacificist and sovereign at once — you oppose higher defence spending, but support seizing Russian assets for Ukraine.

A while back, you were The Welfare Unionist Heretic; you are still welfare-first and constitutionally awkward for the progressive tribe, but your identity has widened into a more explicit internationalist outlook. The recent votes sharpened your opposition to anti-migrant politics and American dependence, while your refusal of more defence spending and HS2 showed that left economics does not mean automatic approval of every public project.

You are neither a reliable populist nor a reliable consensus voter: you sided with the UK majority on 36 of 60 recent votes with data. You often stand against the country on welfare, diversity and migration, but sometimes join it on institutional scrutiny and practical restraint.

You run with your Centre-Left circle, but not in lockstep. Cathryn is your closest ally, especially on personnel and foreign policy; IsaacBeckley is your biggest clash, despite common ground on economy and energy, because environment and personnel pull you apart.

Your open question is whether constitutional Unionism can keep coexisting with an increasingly assertive, anti-interventionist left vision. Ten more votes will test that fault line and make this living picture sharper still.

You are a redistributive, anti-rearmament leftist with an unusually hard constitutional spine: welfare is a duty, rights are real, and public power should not be casually fragmented. You reject the welfare brake and immigration panic, yet still want fiscal discipline, stronger standards, and a state that can punish serious wrongdoing; your vision is a generous UK held together by firm institutions.

You have moved from The Socialist Unionist to a more defiant Welfare Unionist Heretic: the social commitment has held, but your resistance to devolution, EU re-entry and constitutional experimentation has sharpened. The new record also reveals a few harder edges — backing the death penalty and an entrenched deficit rule — without turning you into a conventional right-winger.

You are almost perfectly counter-cyclical: the UK majority often wants tighter borders, welfare cuts and tougher control, while you keep choosing solidarity over suspicion. Yet you are not simply anti-majoritarian; you joined the nation on recall, stronger ministerial standards and direct democracy, and even backed ethnic-national language that most voters rejected.

You run with a Centre-Left crowd, but not in lockstep. Cathryn is your closest ally, especially on personnel and energy, while IsaacBeckley is the sharper friction: economy and energy bring you together, but environment and personnel pull you apart.

Your live question is whether constitutional loyalty can coexist with ever more radical redistribution — especially when fiscal rules and punishment tempt you rightward. Ten more votes will unlock a fresh read, and each ballot will make this unusually distinctive picture truer.

You want a more generous, publicly minded UK: stronger welfare, progressive taxation, universal services and less militarism, with power pushed closer to communities. But you are no instinctive decentraliser; your leftism has a unionist backbone, and you still resist constitutional change when it threatens the shape of the state.

You were The Cautious Unionist; you have become The Socialist Unionist — no longer merely kinder than the right, but unmistakably committed to redistribution, public provision and restraint abroad. The old tension has sharpened rather than vanished: you backed power moving out of Westminster, yet rejected more powers for the Scottish Parliament.

You are often against the national mood, especially on migration, welfare cuts, rearmament and privatisation, while the country frequently chooses the tougher or more market-minded answer. Yet you are not reflexively contrarian: you join the majority on practical basics such as primary-school standards, and your record lands roughly level with the UK overall.

You sit to the left of a Centre-Left circle, agreeing with it more often than not but pulling it towards stronger welfare and anti-war positions. Cathryn is your closest ally, though Defence and Health divide you; ChrisJones is the real opposite, with Rights and Defence exposing the distance between you.

Your open question is whether local power can satisfy your democratic instinct without loosening your unionist grip. Ten more votes will sharpen that fault line — and the picture will become truer every time you return to cast another one.

You're a solid Centre-Left conscience on the things that touch people's lives — marriage equality, a National Care Service, standing against transgender panic and burka bans — but the moment a vote touches the shape of the state itself, you turn hard right. No to Scottish independence, no to regional devolution, no to banning extremist parties. You want fairness delivered by a strong, unified centre, not by fragmenting it.

You're rarely an outlier — siding with the national majority on nine of your eleven votes — but your two breaks are telling: you backed nuclear disarmament against a country that voted 2-to-1 the other way, and you'd keep even extremist parties legal when most of Britain wanted them gone. Quiet dissent, not showmanship.

With MCY1X you're nearly of one mind — Rights binds you tight, even as Constitution splits you apart, which is exactly your own internal fault line playing out in a friendship. ChrisJones is your opposite number, chiefly over Rights, and you only agree with your wider circle a little over half the time — you run with them, but never in lockstep.

Ten votes in and the pattern's already sharp: left heart, unionist spine. Keep voting — every constitutional question you answer will tell us whether that tension resolves, or defines you.