Ful_lim

You vote for a more egalitarian, environmentally serious UK, with stronger public provision, devolved power and rights that survive fashionable panic. But this is not soft-focus socialism: you want the welfare state to demand something back, pensions tied to earnings, and institutions judged by whether they work. Your “ratchet” critique of the triple lock gives the game away: fairness matters more to you than a popular pledge.

You were The Public Ownership Leftist; you have held firmly to the left, but sharpened into The Green Constitutional Dissenter. The newer record adds a harder edge on welfare, crime and order, while making your environmentalism and distrust of centralised power much more explicit.

You sit against the national mood about as often as you sit with it, and your dissent is most pronounced on climate, immigration, public ownership and rights. The sharp tension is that you can sound more disciplinarian than your left identity suggests—backing benefit cuts, tougher conditions and scrapping the triple lock—while rejecting the nation’s appetite for cultural restriction and punitive symbolism.

You run with your Centre-Left circle more often than not, especially with HoneyBodger, where economy and rights put you close to lockstep. Debtats is the rupture: your housing instincts part company sharply, suggesting your leftism is about wealth, ownership and fairness rather than simply following the crowd.

Your next ten votes will test whether the welfare brake is a settled principle or a counterweight to your egalitarianism; the picture only gets truer every time you vote.

You want a country that redistributes quietly and structurally — public utilities back in public hands, the benefit cap scrapped, inequality treated as democracy's actual enemy — while staying unsentimental about institutions, happy to abolish the monarchy or the GLA if the logic points that way.

You split with the national mood almost as often as you join it, which is telling for someone this reliably left: you rejected the extra £15bn for defence that most of the country backed, and turned down NHS reform modelled on France or Germany that nearly seven in ten voters wanted — your left runs structural, not technocratic.

Aberdeen South mostly moved with you and did so more decisively — unanimous on solar-and-storage housing, on scrapping the two-child cap, on abolishing the monarchy — though it broke from you on NHS reform and on the £15bn defence spend, where you sided against a nation your own area also happened to reject.

You've never voted on immigration, education, justice, or foreign policy — significant absences for a voter this settled on welfare and public ownership, since those are exactly the fights that test whether left conviction holds when it gets less comfortable.

This is an early sketch, honestly — 17 scored votes is enough to see the shape but not the edges. Cast a few more, especially somewhere like immigration or justice, and the picture sharpens fast; a fresh read is waiting whenever you are.