GenLee

You want equal enforcement of the law, more defence spending, and drilling in the North Sea — but also a National Care Service, scrapped tuition fees, and a wealth tax on millionaires. This isn't muddle; it's a coherent vision of a firm, self-respecting Britain that still looks after its own — a state that polices "equally even if it conflicts with certain cultural or community expectations," yet won't leave disabled claimants or care-leavers to the market.

You're a majority man at heart — you sided with the national mood on 50 of your last 60 scored votes, from nuclear expansion to scrapping digital ID. Your real breaks come on the harder edges: you rejected the death penalty for child abusers where the country split near evenly, and you backed a wealth tax and PIP overhaul more readily than a typical right-leaning voter would.

You run mostly with your crowd — 65% agreement across 136 shared votes — and lockstep with Mark on defence and energy, the two of you clearly hawkish and pro-nuclear together. But you part ways on the constitution, where you swing left toward Scottish devolution while he doesn't; and Bob is nearly a stranger to you, agreeing barely a third of the time. Your circle leans centre-left overall — you sit to their right on crime and immigration, to their left on welfare's softer edges.

This is early days for the full picture — 61 scored votes is a strong start, not the final word. Keep voting and the shape sharpens: does the disciplinarian in you or the carer win out when they collide again? Your next read will tell you.