HoneyBodger

You are a left-wing civic reformer: housing, education and wealth should be levelled up by an active state, while foreign policy should stand on its own feet. But your egalitarianism is not permissive; on justice, you favour firmer sentencing, accountable policing and boundaries that still mean something. “Look after ourselves” is your international instinct, not isolationism.

You were The Hardline Egalitarian; you are holding that core, but becoming less hardline about borders and more openly internationalist. Your recent votes reject welfare bans, mass deportation and migration-blaming, while your justice streak remains: early release is acceptable only with “stricter parameters”.

You are neither a habitual majority voter nor a theatrical contrarian: you split with the UK about as often as you join it. The sharpest gap is immigration, where you reject several popular restrictionist propositions; the tension is that you can side with a left economic vision while still backing tougher rules in the courtroom.

Your Centre-Right circle is not your political home: you agree with it often enough to stay in conversation, but your deeper commitments on housing, education, taxation and rights pull left. You run alongside them on order and accountability, then part company when “order” becomes exclusion or when markets are left to solve social problems.

Your open question is whether the enforcer and the egalitarian can keep strengthening each other rather than collide. Ten more votes will sharpen that boundary—and the picture will become truer every time you cast one.

You are a hardline egalitarian: housing, rights, energy and wealth taxation are not soft preferences but the architecture of the country you want. Yet you pair that redistribution with tougher justice, stricter immigration and a welfare system that should have obligations as well as protections — solidarity, but not permissiveness. Your instinct is practical too: public power should build homes, reform institutions and make technology accountable, not merely announce principles.

A while back, you were The Sovereign Leveller; now you have sharpened into The Hardline Egalitarian. The old home-front solidarity remains, but your record has broadened into a clearer law-and-order edge: tougher sentencing, tighter PIP rules and a refusal to decriminalise drugs, while still rejecting benefit cuts that punish genuine need.

You usually move with the UK’s majority, but your leftward convictions are more coherent than the national mood: you backed wealth taxes, capital-gains equalisation, public ownership and more Scottish power. The tension is that you can be more left-wing than the country on economics while more punitive than it on justice and immigration.

Your Centre-Right circle is not really your political home: you agree with it often enough to stay in conversation, but not enough to surrender your instincts. GobbyRon remains the ally who best understands your blend; john is the sharpest clash — especially where your economic egalitarianism meets their instincts.

Your open question is whether this becomes a settled muscular-left identity or whether the hard edge remains a set of exceptions. Ten more votes will test that fault line — and make a profile already unusually distinctive even truer.

You want a Britain that builds — council houses at post-war scale, a fairer tax system, a justice system that rehabilitates rather than warehouses — but you want it defended, too. Your left runs deep on rights, welfare and energy, yet you break clean on immigration and defence spending, backing the £15bn uplift and doubting whether "indigenous concerns" have been heard. That's not muddle — it's a worldview where solidarity stops at the water's edge.

The Housing Maximalist has widened out. Housing is still your bedrock — the biggest council build since the war, grey-belt land released — but you're no longer a single-issue conviction with blind spots. You've shown up on justice, energy, rights and, tellingly, defence and immigration, where you now sit to the right of your own average. The thin record has filled in, and it's sharper for it.

You're rarely an outlier — siding with the national majority on most of your recent votes, from Ukraine sanctions to social care pay. Where you diverge, it's pointed: you rejected the "second-class citizens" framing the nation narrowly backed, and you'd keep the forces out of Pride when most said let them in.

You run with your crowd two-thirds of the time, anchored by GobbyRon, who mirrors you almost completely. John is the opposite pole — barely a third of shared votes align — probably your immigration-and-defence heresies showing.

Your record's getting texture fast — each vote you cast tightens this picture, and the immigration/defence fault line is the thread worth pulling. Come back after tomorrow's ballot and see if it hardens or softens.

You vote like someone convinced the housing crisis is the root of everything else — new towns quangos, solar-mandated homes, a wealth tax to fund the whole rebuild. This is a small, early sample, but it's remarkably consistent: wherever housing and the built environment show up, you back the state to act, not the market.

You're usually with the crowd — you backed beef trade deals and defence-by-capability alongside everyone else — but on the votes that split the country, like the Seventh Carbon Budget (a dead-even national vote), you land firmly left where Britain itself couldn't decide. Your one real breach with your own instincts was voting for those trade deals, a rare right-leaning tick in an otherwise leftward record.

No local data has come through yet for your area — with only ten votes cast nationally comparable, there's nothing to set against your town. That's your next gap to close as much as any policy one.

You've never voted on welfare, immigration, justice, or foreign policy — a striking silence for someone this decided on housing and climate. A profile this sharp on the built environment says almost nothing yet about the state, borders, or the courts.

Early days, but the shape is unmistakable — cast a few votes on welfare or immigration and we'll know whether the Housing Maximalist is really a Corbynite-style leftist or something narrower. Every vote you cast sharpens this; come back next week and we'll show you how you've moved.