JM42

You're voting for a Britain that punishes idleness and rewards deterrence: no childcare for "layabouts who don't work," no Hillsborough-style accountability bill, but yes to nuclear capability and yes to replacing the whole pension system with an index-linked fund at birth. This isn't reflexive Toryism — it's an audit mentality applied to the state, cutting what doesn't produce results and doubling down on what does.

You split almost exactly down the middle with the country — siding with the majority on 14 of 30 recent votes — but the disagreements are the tell. You rejected the Hillsborough Law that 81% backed, waved off Trump's NATO spending demands that 71% supported, and wanted the JCPOA scrapped when most of Britain wanted it kept. You're not contrarian for its own sake; you're contrarian wherever a policy looks like spectacle rather than substance — your own words dismiss aircraft carriers and jets as "vanity projects" next to drones and missiles.

You've never voted on culture, science, technology, or employment — odd gaps for someone this opinionated on AI regulation and welfare conditionality. Fill them in and the "efficiency state" thesis either hardens or cracks.

Early days with 32 scored votes, but the throughline is already sharp. Every vote you cast tightens this picture — cast a few in Technology or Employment and we'll see whether the capability-first logic holds outside defence and welfare too.