JasonC

You are a Centre-Right voter with an unusually left economic instinct. You want justice delivered decisively — your justice votes are uniformly right-leaning — while your economic record points towards taxing concentrated wealth and challenging the idea that markets automatically improve lives. That is not a muddle: it is a demand for a capable state with both authority and obligations. Your recent votes make the model clearer. You backed a wealth tax, rejected the claim that supply-side policy has lifted everyone, supported universal free school meals and opposed cutting overtime tax relief. You also voted yes to national service and to scrapping quangos: fairness, in your view, needs structure behind it.

From The Sovereigntist Pacifist to The Punitive Egalitarian: the notable movement is rights, which crossed from Right into Centre across your record, even as justice remains firmly right-leaning.

In the week of 2026-W36, your votes briefly banded Centre. That waypoint matters because your record is not simply a march rightward: you can pair strict justice with support for wealth taxation, stronger renter protection and public investment.

You are neither reliably with nor against the national majority. You stood against the country on the proposed wealth tax — voting yes as the UK split narrowly against it — and on banning Notting Hill Carnival, where your yes faced a narrow national no. Your instinct is to make the state more demanding and more socially protective than the median voter expects.

You agree with your mostly Centre-Left circle about two-thirds of the time, but your justice and immigration instincts pull you right of the people you follow.

Twenty-four more votes earn the next read; the open question is how far your economic egalitarianism reaches as the record grows truer.

You are clearly right-leaning on the machinery of society: punishment, education, immigration and the shape of the state. But your record also carries a distinct international restraint — you backed rejoining the EU and rejected the idea that every overseas conflict demands a harder British response.

You have moved from The Rights-and-Borders Dissenter to The Sovereigntist Pacifist: justice crossed from Right into Hard Right, and the constitution has emerged as a clear right-leaning concern. Foreign policy is newly Centre Left, giving your conservatism a more defined limit abroad.

You usually land with the UK majority, but your minority positions are revealing: you rejected HS2’s Manchester extension, opposed rehabilitation for prisoners and backed replacing human-rights treaties with a UK bill of rights. The country often joins you on immigration and institutional authority; it does not always share your severity.

You run substantially to the right of a Centre-Left circle, agreeing with them often enough to show this is not mere contrarianism, but not enough to blur the gap. Your closest ally and biggest clash are not named in the record; the open personal comparison is whether your circle can follow you on justice while accepting your foreign-policy restraint.

This read finally has enough of your whole record behind it to show the shape: sovereignty at home, restraint abroad. Six more votes unlock the next read, and each one will test whether that balance holds or whether one side finally wins.

You want a firmer UK: tougher on crime, immigration and institutional authority, more demanding of schools, and less patient with fashionable evasions. Yet you are not a pure small-state conservative — you back universal free school meals, basic income and renewable investment, while your instinct on energy is distinctly interventionist; your politics say “discipline”, but not necessarily “leave everything to the market”.

A while back you were The Domestic Disciplinarian; you are holding that shape, but sharpening into a more rights-conscious and educationally hard-edged conservative. Justice has moved further right, while your new positions on education and rights have confirmed the direction — with green economics still the unresolved exception.

You usually move with the national majority, but your convictions are more settled than the public mood: on borders, punishment and cultural authority, you vote with real purpose rather than drift. Your willingness to join the military and your support for scrapping online-speech restraints show a state that should be stronger in the street, yet less censorious in public life.

Your circle averages Centre-Left, but you agree with it two-thirds of the time — a surprisingly workable alliance, not ideological lockstep. You run with them on interventionist economics and energy, then part company over immigration, justice and the boundaries of social authority.

Your next ten votes will test whether the green, economically interventionist streak can coexist with your increasingly hard domestic edge. Each ballot sharpens this picture, and the next read will be truer because you kept voting.

You want a more disciplined UK: firmer borders, tougher consequences, benefits tied to contribution, and institutions that defend inherited rules rather than apologise for them. Your instincts are especially hard-edged on justice, rights and welfare, but your record is not pure culture-war politics: you also back rent controls, bus subsidies, domestic investment and a stronger minimum wage. Even your small-boats view is enforcement with legal restraint — “detain and escort” rather than sink them.

You have moved from The Constitutional Non-Interventionist into The Domestic Disciplinarian: the constitutional conservatism remains, but immigration has hardened from Centre-Right into Right and justice has now emerged clearly on the right. Abroad, however, the old exception survives; you rejected the march towards confrontation over Ukraine and still voted left on Gaza-related foreign-policy questions.

You usually travel with the national majority — on 41 of 49 recorded votes — but your certainty is more ideological than the country’s broad, shifting consensus. The sharp tension is that you are uncompromising about domestic order while unusually reluctant to extend that forcefulness into foreign policy.

Your Centre-Left circle is not your political home, though you agree with it often enough to show selective loyalty rather than permanent rebellion. You run with them on practical state action and some economic protections, then part company decisively on borders, punishment, welfare and social order.

Your next ten votes will test whether restraint abroad still balances your domestic hardening, and each answer will make the portrait truer; keep voting and the read sharpens with you.

You want a firmer, more accountable UK: tighter rules on immigration and welfare, serious standards in education and justice, and institutions that still mean something. But your right-leaning politics stops at the water’s edge: you support defence, yet reject reckless force abroad, insisting that even the small boats must be handled within “maritime law”.

You have moved from The Early-Days Traditionalist to a more defined constitutional conservative: still firm on inherited standards, but now clearer about limits on state power and military action. Immigration has settled into a centre-right position, while your left-leaning foreign policy has become the most revealing break from your wider outlook.

You usually vote with the UK’s majority, but not as a passive follower: you backed abolishing inheritance tax, tougher benefit rules and criminal standards while also supporting rent controls, stronger digital infrastructure and a Gaza genocide finding. Your instinct is practical rather than doctrinaire—discipline at home, restraint abroad.

Your Centre-Left circle is closer to you than the label suggests: you agree with them on two-thirds of shared votes, likely meeting around public investment and international restraint while parting on welfare, rights and constitutional firmness. You run alongside the crowd often, but your overall record remains distinctly to its right.

The whole record now gives this read real shape; your next ten votes will show whether constitutional firmness or non-interventionist restraint becomes the deeper anchor. Each vote sharpens the picture, and the next read will be truer still.

You are an emerging centre-right voter who wants a more disciplined, confident UK: tougher on crime and immigration, sceptical of free university tuition, and willing to use the state where it delivers—on defence, housing, buses, the NHS and technology. Your strongest early signals are a belief in firm rights and educational standards, with a quieter traditionalism visible in support for faith schools and celebrating the country’s history; but this is still a first sketch, not a finished political identity.

You usually travel with the national mood, siding with the UK majority on 16 of your 20 recent votes. Your sharper departures come when the country wants greater openness or softer penalties: you resisted welcoming more skilled workers and backed a wide death penalty, while still accepting rent controls and proactive AI regulation—an orderly conservative, not a reflexive free-marketeer.

You run somewhat with your Centre-Left circle, agreeing on shared votes often enough to show you are not politically isolated, but your instincts are firmer than theirs. You can meet them on public provision and regulation, then part company over immigration, education and the boundaries of authority; there is no named closest ally or clash in this record, so the personal fault line is still emerging.

Your next 10 votes will turn this grounded first sketch into a truer profile, especially revealing whether your traditionalism hardens or makes room for your practical, interventionist streak.