JoFrench

You are strongly right-wing, with your clearest convictions concentrated in justice and immigration. The distinctive thread is not simply toughness: you favour rules that bite in public life, while allowing more latitude in private life — backing regulated sex work and legal marijuana alongside scrapping non-crime hate incidents and replacing human-rights treaties.

You have moved from The Emerging Right Hardliner to The Order Maximalist: the underlying worldview is familiar, but justice and immigration have now entered the record as plainly right-leaning themes in their own right. The new votes also show a more defined suspicion of grand state projects, from HS2 to universal free school meals, without turning you into a blanket authoritarian: you rejected a social-media ban and compulsory military service.

You usually stand where the UK stands — including on reduced immigration, ending Sharia Councils and scrapping non-crime hate incidents — but your scepticism of HS2 and willingness to replace human-rights treaties put you on the less accommodating edge of a country that often prefers reform to rupture.

The whole record now gives this read a firmer foundation; one more vote earns the next profile, where the open question is whether your appetite for order expands into economics and the state, or remains focused on borders, justice and institutional control. Each vote makes the picture truer.

You want a more controlled, more punitive UK: tighter immigration rules, tougher consequences for offenders, a smaller welfare promise and less institutional accommodation of ideas you distrust. But this is still an early sketch; your one clear exception is a willingness to legalise and regulate marijuana, suggesting firmness is not quite the same as blanket prohibition.

You were The Early-Days Rightist; you have held that direction but sharpened it into a more explicit order-and-borders politics, from refugee rules and migration to Palestine Action and single-sex spaces. The underlying scepticism about expensive state projects remains, while your support for donation limits shows you can still break left on a question of political power.

You usually travel with the national majority, but your strongest instincts often run harder than the country’s: you rejected universal basic income, GCSE reform and a new regional parliament while backing refugee-rule replacement and tougher offender repayment. You are not simply anti-establishment; you want authority to work, and to be visibly enforced.

Your next ten votes will turn this first sketch into a truer portrait—especially whether cultural hardening becomes a settled worldview, or meets a more pragmatic streak already visible in your marijuana and political-donations votes.

You are voting for a more controlled, security-minded UK: firmer on immigration, stronger on defence, and wary of grand public schemes from council-house building to HS2. Your instinct is not simply “do less”; it is to avoid costly promises and keep power concentrated rather than devolved.

You usually land with the national majority, but your clearest instincts are harder-edged than the country’s mood: you rejected diversity as an unqualified strength and linked mass migration to serious social harms. At the same time, you joined the broad consensus that the economy is in trouble and backed higher defence spending.

This is an early-days read, built from only a handful of politically revealing votes, so the outline is clearer than the detail. Tomorrow’s ballot may show whether your rightward instinct is mainly about borders and order, or part of a wider suspicion of state spending, regional power and international intervention; keep voting and the picture will sharpen fast.