Js2119

You want a Britain that keeps essential things — utilities, healthcare, holidays for the working public — in public hands and public benefit, but you're not allergic to a business-friendly tweak if it seems sensible. Voting yes on public control of utilities and backing GPs taking collective action shows where your gut sits; voting yes on stripping policy costs from business bills shows you're not a purist about it.

You mostly move with the country — siding with the national majority on eight of your ten votes — but you broke from it hard on Mo Farah's knighthood, standing with the sympathetic minority (29% yes) while most of Britain who voted wanted it gone, and again on PIP reform, where you said no while nearly four in five nationally said yes.

Christchurch backed you almost everywhere you looked — unanimous local yeses on sanctions, bank holidays, utilities, GP action, energy reform — except on PIP and Starmer's "treason" question, where your area matched your no exactly. Thin as it is (single voters per question), it reads as a patch that's currently walking in step with you.

You've never voted on immigration, housing, defence, justice, or the constitution — the fault lines that usually reveal a voter's edges are all untouched, so this is very much a sketch, not a portrait.

Ten votes and six with real signal is enough to see the shape of you, not the whole of you — cast a few more, especially somewhere like immigration or housing, and next week's read will start telling you something you couldn't have guessed yourself.