LMaurice

You are a strongly right-wing traditionalist with your sharpest instincts around rights, borders and national defence. You favour deportation, rearmament, nuclear strength and North Sea drilling, yet your refusal to ban Islam and your support for a National Care Service reveal a harder-edged but not purely punitive conservatism: order matters, but so does provision.

You were previously The Social Traditionalist; you have held that core identity, but sharpened it into something more defence-first and institutionally conservative. Recent votes against wealth taxes, stronger trade unions and a redesigned Lords, alongside support for channel gunboats and rearmament, make the old welfare-left streak look like a principled exception rather than the direction of travel.

You often stand with the national majority, but not comfortably inside it: the country can move with you on security while pulling away on Lords reform, social change and state intervention. Your clearest break is refusing public funding for gender-affirming treatment while also rejecting an outright ban on Islam — a boundary-drawing politics, not indiscriminate hostility.

You run broadly with your right-leaning circle, though not in lockstep. Suzy is your natural ally on constitutional questions; Gastfo is the recurring friction point, even where you share that same constitutional instinct.

The open question is whether your instinct for a protective state — care, health and perhaps other essentials — can coexist with your growing emphasis on borders, defence and institutional discipline. Ten more votes will sharpen that fault line and make this picture truer.

You vote for a Britain that holds its shape — against marriage equality, against Scottish independence, against devolved assemblies, in favour of nuclear deterrence and deporting foreign offenders. This is a small-c conservative country you're voting for: cohesive, unbending on culture, sceptical of institutional change, but not without a welfare floor — your yes to a National Care Service funded from general taxation shows the state still has a job to do when it comes to care.

You're evenly split with the country, siding with the majority on six of your ten votes — but the misses are pointed. On marriage equality you were with 42 others against 161; on transgenderism you were in a minority the nation rejected 58-42. You're not chasing consensus, you're voting a fixed set of convictions and letting the numbers fall where they will.

You run close with your crowd — three in four shared votes align — and lockstep with AshKillon on the constitutional questions, a rare 100% match. ghistygoo is your friction point: you meet on rights but split on the constitution, the fault line running right through the pair of you.

Ten votes in, the shape of you is already legible — rights-hawkish, welfare-flexible, institution-wary — but it's early days. Cast a few more and this profile stops sketching you and starts knowing you; check back next week and see what's sharpened.