RobRobertson

You want the machinery of the state rebuilt — written constitution, no monarchy, devolved power to the English regions — but you pair that appetite for structural change with practical, almost managerial instincts on spending, shopfronts and defence procurement. This isn't a radical's Britain; it's a tidier one, reorganised rather than torn down.

You're rarely the outlier: eleven of fourteen votes put you in step with the national majority, and on the sweeping questions — Thatcher's regional impact, devolution, the monarchy — you're comfortably inside the consensus. But on "Is the UK too London-centric?" you broke hard from a nation that voted 87% yes — a striking dissent for a man voting from Dulwich.

Where local data exists, you and your neighbours in Dulwich and West Norwood are in lockstep — unanimous against abolishing the NHS, unanimous for devolution and against Thatcher's legacy being fairly distributed. Your patch is a stronghold of agreement; you've simply never had reason to push against it yet.

For someone this engaged with constitutional plumbing, you've said nothing on immigration, welfare, housing or health — the categories that usually reveal where centrism actually bends. Right now your "centrist, mixed" reading rests on just four scored votes; it's a sketch, not a portrait.

This is early days — four scored votes is barely a fingerprint — but the shape is already interesting: institutional reformer, local loyalist, occasional contrarian. Vote on immigration or welfare next and we'll find out whether the centrism holds or cracks.