StuartFaulds

You want a Britain that leans toward the vulnerable by instinct: PIP protected, judges left discretion, wealth taxed harder than wages, shared-ownership tenants bailed out before they're abandoned. This isn't soft-touch drift — it's a coherent belief that state power should widen safety nets, not narrow them.

Last time you were the Clemency Radical, breaking hard against Britain's punitive mood on deportation and sentencing. That instinct hasn't faded — it's sharpened and spread: the same mercy that once shaped your justice votes now shows up in welfare and economics, unanimously left across both. You've gone from a single sharp break to a whole worldview built on it.

You split down the middle with the country, agreeing on barely half your recent votes — but the disagreements aren't random. When Britain wanted PIP tightened or judges toughened, you were the lone hold-out for leniency; when Britain wanted force over the Falklands, you said no while the nation split evenly. Your defence instincts stay curiously sovereigntist even as your justice instincts stay soft — a genuine, unresolved tension.

You run only loosely with your Centre-Left crowd, agreeing scarcely more than half the time. RichardJohn is your nearest match, but even NatalieMarkham — your sharpest clash — pulls you back toward the mainstream Left rather than away from it. You're the outlier even among outliers.

The Falklands contradiction is still sitting there unresolved — cast a few more defence votes and we'll see whether the pacifist or the sovereigntist wins. Every vote sharpens this picture; tomorrow's read is already waiting.

Your convictions run deepest on constitution, rights and economy — a wealth tax, an elected Lords, Scottish independence, marriage equality all unanimous yeses. You're building a Britain that redistributes upward wealth downward and devolves power outward, and you trust institutions less than you trust fairness.

You split almost evenly with the national mood, but the disagreements are the point: you voted against deporting foreign offenders when 86% of Britain said yes, against whole-life sentences when two-thirds wanted them, against expanding the burka ban and against branding trans identity a threat — a consistent refusal to let justice and rights questions be settled by the crowd. Yet you're not reflexively anti-security: you backed US tanker aircraft in Bulgaria and reclaiming sovereign control of the nuclear deterrent, which sits oddly against your vote to block further nuclear development — a live contradiction in how far you'll let Britain arm itself.

You run only slightly with your own crowd — agreeing scarcely more than half the time despite following a Centre-Left circle. RichardJohn is your closest ally, siding with you well over half the time; NatalieMarkham is your sharpest clash, disagreeing more often than not, suggesting your leniency-first instincts don't map neatly onto anyone else's left.

Seventeen scored votes is a real signal but not yet a settled portrait — keep voting and tomorrow's read will sharpen where mercy ends and security begins for you.