pompom

You vote for a country that taxes wealth harder, buys back unsellable shared-ownership homes, funds a lower retirement age through higher National Insurance, and reforms a prison system 85% of the country agrees is broken. This is a coherent redistributive programme — wealth tax, housing intervention, welfare protection — but it sits inside a fiercely libertarian shell: you rejected the Burka ban, the death penalty, and even a 9pm junk food ad ban, calling nanny-statism the wrong instinct even from your own side.

Last time you were the Redistributive Zealot, unanimous almost everywhere. That programme hasn't cracked — economy, justice and housing remain your strongest convictions — but this week's votes sharpen the edge you only hinted at before: you're not just left, you're left-and-anti-authoritarian, breaking from the crowd on junk food ads specifically to defend personal choice.

You split with the country roughly as often as you side with it — voting to rejoin the EU and keep immigration where it is against big national majorities, but landing with the nation on prison reform and Lords retirement age. You're not a contrarian; you're just further left than the room, most visibly on tax and welfare.

Early days on this front — your circle data is thin, but your instincts already run ahead of the pack on redistribution and behind them on state control of personal life.

This read gets sharper every vote you cast — next week, feed it something on immigration, business or foreign policy and watch the freethinker case harden or crack.

You want a Britain that taxes the trillion-pound man, funds a National Care Service from general taxation, controls rents, and abolishes the monarchy on the way past — a levelling project with no half-measures, unanimous left across defence, justice, housing and the economy alike.

Last week you were the Peace Dividend Insurgent, defined by trading tanks for welfare; that fusion is still there, but you've broadened out — wealth taxes, rent controls, PR, a National Care Service — into something less a single insurgency than a fully worked-out programme. The dove instinct has become a doctrine.

You side with the national majority barely more than a coin flip's worth — 13 of 30 — because your left runs deeper than the country's centrist reflexes: you wanted the aid target restored when eight in ten said no, and you'd tighten nothing on PIP claimants while most of Britain voted to squeeze them.

Your local sample is thin — one voter each time — but it mirrors you almost perfectly, agreeing even where Britain didn't, on rejoining the EU, on UBI, on scrapping FPTP. Watch for that to diversify as more of Hitchin weighs in.

You've never voted on international affairs, business, science or technology — striking given how firmly you've priced in a wealth tax and a data-centre "no." Your economic left is decided; its foreign and technological edges aren't yet drawn.

This read sharpens with every vote you cast — bring your convictions to the untouched ground of international policy and technology, and next week's profile will be even truer to the Britain you're actually building.

You want a Britain that redistributes before it rearms: scrap the two-child cap, nationalise-minded on utilities, EU-rejoining, monarchy-abolishing, and deeply unconvinced that grievance politics — "two-tier justice," white Britons as "second-class citizens" — describes the country you live in.

Last week you were "The Unbought Left" on instinct alone, no scored votes to prove it. You've since delivered a near-unanimous left record across defence, justice, economy and welfare — the guess has become a conviction, and a sharper one: you're not just anti-establishment, you're specifically willing to trade guns for butter.

You split with the nation almost exactly down the middle overall, but on the one issue where Britain is nearly unanimous — defence spending — you're the outlier. The country voted 92% yes to raising it to 3% of GDP; you said no, and you'd cut it further to fund employment and welfare instead.

Your one recorded local neighbour mirrors you near-perfectly — same no on ID cards, same yes on scrapping the benefit cap, same abolish-the-monarchy instinct. Too thin a sample to call it your area's character yet, but it's an unusually exact echo.

You've never voted on health, international affairs or technology — striking, given how confidently you've called AI-driven UBI and automation. Fill those in and this hard-left profile stops being a sketch and becomes a full portrait.

You're consistently suspicious of concentrated power — billionaires, underpaying CEOs, Reform UK — and consistently generous toward the people society likes to punish, whether that's non-British defendants or Muslims asked to "reform." The Britain you're voting for is one where wealth answers to democracy, and no group gets scapegoated to make anyone else feel safer.

You're often out on your own: the nation said yes on the death penalty, yes on tougher sentencing for non-Brits, yes that Islam needs reforming, yes the Green Party's a danger — you said no to all of it. Where you did align was economic: most of Britain agrees the rich have too much, and so do you.

Here's the twist — your one-person "local area" mirrors you vote for vote, agreeing on nearly everything from solar subsidies to billionaire power. Early days, but right now Hitchin looks like an echo, not a challenge.

You've cast opinions on wealth, crime and culture-war flashpoints, but never once on housing, health, education or welfare — the bread-and-butter stuff that usually reveals whether a worldview survives contact with policy detail.

Ten votes is a sketch, not a portrait — vote on welfare or housing next and we'll see if the redistributive instinct holds when it costs something closer to home. This profile updates every week; the more you vote, the sharper and truer this gets.