scottybailey81

You're a security-first, welfare-tightened conservative with an unfashionable soft spot for economic fairness — happy to scrap the triple lock and back the death penalty, yet just as ready to say CEOs earn "hundreds of times" too much. This isn't confusion; it's a Britain you want that's tougher at the border and on benefits, but not crueller to the ordinary worker underneath.

You side with the national majority most of the time — on defence over welfare, on reforming benefits, on CANZUK — but you break hard on the culture-war questions the country has mostly settled: you don't buy that Reform is dangerous, you think the Green Party is, and you shrugged off tougher sentencing for foreign nationals when most who voted wanted it. You're a majority voter who picks his own fights.

Greenwich and Woolwich leans Remain and NHS-loyal, and so do you on both counts — no rejoin, no abolition — but your area is far more sceptical of the triple-lock cut than you, where you voted with the reformers alone in your ballot. You're a local who agrees with the neighbourhood on instinct, not ideology.

You've never voted on health, transport, technology or culture — a striking gap for someone this decided on defence and welfare. Given how sharp your convictions are elsewhere, filling in Culture or Business would tell us whether the fairness streak in your economics is a one-off or a real second half of who you are.

This is early days for your profile — thirty scored votes is a strong start, not the full picture. Keep voting and the throughline sharpens: right now you're a defence hawk with a redistributive conscience, and every ballot you finish gets us closer to knowing which one really leads.