refnation
Do government efforts to tackle misinformation threaten free speech?
RightsEnds 11 Oct 18m left

Do government efforts to tackle misinformation threaten free speech?

The UK government is establishing the National Centre for Information Defence, announced by Prime Minister Andy Burnham in September 2026, to detect, attribute and disrupt hostile state disinformation and deepfakes, working with intelligence agencies, police and social media firms. It builds on the Online Safety Act 2023, now partially in force, which requires platforms to address illegal and harmful content with Ofcom enforcement. The policy focuses on foreign interference and public resilience but has drawn criticism that it risks chilling lawful domestic debate.

Jump to opinions· 72
Cast your vote1,607 votes so far

Vote to unlock the result — plus the full breakdown by age, gender, constituency and political leaning.

DocketAlso on today's ballot
Debate

72 Opinions

Sign in and vote to share your opinion.
SimonD· 122
The Statesman
Voted yesCentre lean

The government wants to define any criticism of Islam or Islamist politics as Islamophobic or effectively blasphemous. Women standing up for women's rights have also been persecuted by the police acting on behalf of trans rights activists. The government is not to be trusted in ruling what is misinformation.

The Civic Gatekeeper
Voted yesRight lean

The Labour government want you to only hear what they are saying. Even though more than half the country oppose it and can see the truth

Estella· 464
The Ballot-Box Sovereign
Voted yesH. Right lean

Newspeak for all seems only a blink away. After all who wants those irritating abstract thinkers questioning what’s good for them? Labsoc is here to punish thoughtcrimes. Possibly because most of them seem unable to think except in collective catchphrases.

Jonathan· 533
The Civic Gatekeeper
Voted yesRight lean

It's the "efforts" that is the key word here. Two tier information control.

AW84· 284
The Unifier
Voted noC. Left lean

First camp says - don't tell lies or you will face consequences but we will still leave the lies public for the people to decide. Second camp says - the first camp ALWAYS lies, Trust Us to tell you the facts. Trust Us to decipher what you hear. Trust Us to explain why you heard that we told a lie. Trust Us to create a new medium for you to watch & listen to only. Trust Us even if something feels off. Trust Us because we are the ONLY ones who care about you. Trust Us. 🤨 Edited

Octig· 148
The Centre-Right Justice Hardliner
Voted yesC. Right lean

Governments can't be allowed to decide what facts we are to believe, we have trouble enough with the guided MSM news being shoved down our throats, without banning other sources. It is snipping at the edges of free speech

The Media-Sovereignty Firebrand
Voted yesRight lean

Every government in history would love the ability to decide what is fact

Geedon· 176
The All-Rounder
Voted yesRight lean

Thats the entire point! Its never been about children, you can see how much they care by how they import dangerous migrant rapists. Did they even mention Lowe's rape investigation? no! have they made progress on their own? no! They only want to silence the opposition and it is blatantly obvious!

The Market-First Hardliner
Voted yesH. Right lean

Yes. There is a reason that the most frightening words in the English language are “I am from the government and I am here to help.” The government is the largest and principal source of misinformation and always will be. I can choose not to buy the Guardian. I am compelled on pain of imprisonment to pay for the government and its BBC mouthpiece.

The Labour Commonwealth Builder
Voted noLeft lean

If people like Farage didn't lie so much would there be a need to combat it? Nobody is saying you can't say anything. A better way is to make public figures legally accountable for knowingly lying and spreading deliberate false information