Should all irregular arrivals claiming asylum be held in secure facilities prior to processing?
The UK processes asylum claims from people arriving irregularly, mainly by small boat. In the year to June 2026, 33,000 small boat arrivals were recorded with 86,000 total asylum claims, though the initial decision backlog has fallen to 40,000. The government uses immigration detention for some cases to support returns and has expanded ex-military sites for accommodation while closing asylum hotels, but most asylum seekers live in the community during processing under current rules.
7 Opinions
Virtually every other first world country does it. Why the hell don't we?
How about we don't play with words. They are not 'irregular' arrivals. They are unlawful invaders. They are breaking our border laws. Like any other lawbreaker, they should be punished. Like anyone else who will not produce valid ID, they should be held until identity is proven. Having been found guilty of unlawful border crossing, they should be deported. This lawbreaking must stop. The nation must prioritise and protect its citizens, not the invaders.
There's no way to open an asylum claim without first establishing their true identity and background. At least, verify a few basic details before letting people into the country.
The hotel system is bad, but spending billions on creating essentially prisons would be even worse.
Yes, and I'd go further. A blanket ban on any irregular arrivals ever being given leave to remain. It is the only way it will stop. All the while there is hope that entering this way will provide a route to staying in the UK, it will continue. Remove the incentive.
Yes, initially they should. Realistically, we should know who is crossing its borders and where they are. Letting thousands of unvetted arrivals disperse into local towns puts huge pressure on councils and allows failed claimants to vanish into the shadow economy. Secure reception facilities aren't cruelty, they're basic border control.