refnation
Should there be a 2% tax on individual wealth over £10 million?
EconomyEnded 2 Sept

Should there be a 2% tax on individual wealth over £10 million?

Yes 47%No 53%575 votes cast

The UK has no annual wealth tax. Proposals for a 2% levy on individual net wealth exceeding £10 million would affect around 20,000-32,000 people and could raise up to £24 billion yearly according to campaigners like Tax Justice UK and Oxfam. Recent academic modelling instead recommends a 2% minimum effective tax on total wealth for the roughly 1,000 households worth over £100 million, projected to raise £10 billion in 2026 and reduce the budget deficit by nearly a third. Prime Minister Andy Burnham has signalled wealth taxes are not an immediate priority.

Jump to opinions· 26

“Whilst at the same time royalty pay nothing on billions of pounds of inheritance” was the floor’s most-respected Yes case, framing the levy as a corrective to a tax system that falls harder on ordinary earners. The narrow decision showed that appeal was powerful but not quite sufficient.

The No argument was less a single theory than a demand for restraint. The room heard “No more taxes, they are killing economy”, alongside the more specific warning that a wealth tax could “destroy small businesses in this country”.

Yes voters answered with public need and distributional fairness: “Working people pay tax on every penny earned”, while the case for funding infrastructure and the NHS was that the rich had “the broadest shoulders”. The two sides often talked past each other, with one discussing who should carry the burden and the other asking whether the state could value, collect and enforce it without damaging investment.

That makes this a vote about trust in the machinery of taxation as much as the principle of taxing wealth. The sharpest No objection was that it would be “Too expensive to set up”, while even a cautious Yes voice conceded that “The key would be in the implementation”.

The verdict was narrow, but the chamber’s anxiety was clear: fairness made the moral case; feasibility decided the room.

“I'm Britain today you have Joe public paying inheritance tax on a few thousand pounds of inheritance. Whilst at the same time royalty pay nothing on billions of pounds of inheritance, along with the super rich employing accountants to avoid paying their fair of inheritance tax. Until that changes without doubt there should be a wealth tax, just to level the playing field!”

YES case · JustFactsNotBeliefs · 4 respects

“No more taxes, they are killing economy. Cut the spendings to bare minimum.”

NO case · Slawomir · 4 respects

53%
No
majority
47% Yes
Votes575
Skipped4
You—

% voting yes, by leaning

100% yes among H. Left voters, 35 of them
98% yes among Left voters, 83 of them
78% yes among C. Left voters, 68 of them
67% yes among Centre voters, 55 of them
48% yes among C. Right voters, 63 of them
17% yes among Right voters, 230 of them
2% yes among H. Right voters, 53 of them
H. Left
Left
C. Left
Centre
C. Right
Right
H. Right
Cite this result

refnation referendum, closed 2 September 2026: “Should there be a 2% tax on individual wealth over £10 million?” — No 53% (575 votes).

Free to quote with a link to this page — Copy includes it.

LeftCentreRight
Spread the wordShare
Debate

26 Opinions

Sign in and vote to share your opinion.
BenL· 441
The Revered
Voted yesC. Left lean

Working people pay tax on every penny earned through overtime, yet multi-million fortunes sit virtually untouched. A modest 2% levy on wealth over £10m isn't punishment, is it? It's basic fairness.

Akz99· 383
The Constitutional Pluralist
Voted yesC. Left lean

I'd usually be vehemently opposed to this. However when you see where tax burden lies, it overwhelmingly ends up being dumped onto higher salary earners while their employers end up paying pennies through loopholes. If a wealth tax can be implemented that avoids these loopholes and is actually enforceable, then it could lead to a fairer taxation system for employees, who at the moment are dealing with a cost of living crisis.

The Peacemaker
Voted yesC. Left lean

I'm Britain today you have Joe public paying inheritance tax on a few thousand pounds of inheritance. Whilst at the same time royalty pay nothing on billions of pounds of inheritance, along with the super rich employing accountants to avoid paying their fair of inheritance tax. Until that changes without doubt there should be a wealth tax, just to level the playing field!

Slawomir· 901
The Accountable Capitalist
Voted noRight lean

No more taxes, they are killing economy. Cut the spendings to bare minimum.

The Public-Purpose Leftist
Voted yesLeft lean

We are underfunded at the moment and trickle down economics is not working. I see this as a one off and the investment decisions need to be precise. Considered tax reform should follow. Opponents due to “Public Sector wastage” should note that a huge amount of public sector money is funnelled into consultancies and outsourcing contracts. Some £10m earners reside there (it’s cyclical).

Astobie1· 651
The Work-First Traditionalist
Voted noRight lean

It hasn't worked elsewhere in the World. It's a sop to an economically illiterate electorate

Dragontao· 463
The Foreign-Policy Reformer
Voted noC. Right lean

This isn't a straightforward yes or no question. The politics of envy. Where wealth is not held in cash, taxing assets can have a negative effect. As with inheritance tax on farmers. Many things only become real wealth once they are sold, and are only wealth on paper. Where that wealth is tied up in business, it can stifle investment and the growth the Labour party has made a priority.

Bigden40· 546
The Unifier
Voted noRight lean

Wealth taxes don’t work, there is a lot of evidence for this. A wealth tax with these thresholds would destroy small businesses in this country.

BigSaucy· 334
The Investment-State Socialist
Voted yesC. Left lean

Britain needs all the money we can get if we are to invest the money we need to fix our out of date infrastructure and fund the NHS when we have an ageing population. However, the burden increasingly seems to fall on middle income earners and small businessses. A wealth tax would target those with the broadest shoulders, while still funding our economy. The key would be in the implementation; wealth taxes have been a mixed bag where they’ve been used

The Administrative Radical
Voted noC. Left lean

Agree in principle but capital flight/offshore loopholes are the mostly likely outcome, which would prove a larger risk