BDenholm

You vote for a state that acts — build the railway, build the reactors, gut the judicial reviews holding up housing, and don't wait for consensus. This is a builder's Britain, impatient with process, comfortable with power.

You're not a contrarian by instinct — you matched the national verdict on six of ten recent votes — but where you break, you break hard right: you said no to devolved assemblies while the country split down the middle in favour, and no to funding a National Care Service from general taxation while most of Britain said yes. You want the machinery of state pointed at delivery, not redistribution.

St Albans backed you almost everywhere — unanimous on defence, the railway, and cutting judicial reviews — making you less an outlier locally than a fairly faithful transcript of your own street. The one place you split from your neighbours was energy policy, where your area itself was evenly divided and you landed on the sceptical side.

Six scored votes is a start, not a verdict — you've never touched immigration, tax, education or justice, the very fights that would tell us whether this is authentic hard-right conviction or just a builder's impatience with red tape. One meningitis vaccine vote (a stray leftward tick) and Andy Burnham's future are the only softening notes in an otherwise firm file.

Cast a few votes on immigration or tax and this profile stops being a sketch and becomes a portrait — every vote you add sharpens the picture, and we'll be back next week with the next draft of who you are.