NevilleJones

You want a Britain that keeps its promises to the vulnerable — council homes built not sold, public utilities back in public hands, asylum seekers not deported on a five-year clock. Housing, rights and immigration are where your left leans hardest, and they're not separate causes to you — they're the same argument for a country that doesn't abandon people.

The Council Housing Loyalist has generalised. What was a narrow, housing-anchored conviction has spread into immigration and rights with real force — you're no longer just pro-council-homes, you're prepared to vote against 177-33 national margins to keep deportees here. The welfare-state instinct you were tested on has held, and sharpened.

You split with the country almost exactly down the middle overall, but your genuine breaks come on the votes that matter most — the burka ban, deportation, the "genocide" comment on Gaza you posted with no takers. You're not swimming with the tide or against it; you're picking your fights.

You run with HoneyBodger nearly two-thirds of the time — lockstep on housing and rights, but you part ways on defence and immigration, oddly, given how strongly you lean left there yourself. Stairhopper is your true opposite number.

Immigration and defence are where you and your closest ally quietly diverge — vote a few more there and we'll see if it's a fault line or a fluke. Every vote sharpens this; check back next week.

Your clearest conviction is bricks and mortar: you want government building council homes again, redirecting housing money and topping up social housing funding without hesitation. That's the throughline — a Britain where the state builds, rather than waits for the market to fix what it broke.

You're not a reflexive rebel — you matched the national mood on six of your ten votes, including the landslide for keeping the nuclear deterrent under NATO arrangements. But when you diverge, it's pointed: you backed Lewisham councils refusing to cooperate with Home Office raids when 91% of the country said no, and you'd keep judges' sentencing discretion when seven in ten wanted it curbed.

No local data has come through yet for your area — early days, so there's nothing yet to set your votes against your neighbours'. That's the first gap worth closing.

Seven scored votes is a start, not a verdict, and whole fields — economy, defence, education, the constitution — are untouched. Your left lean on housing and health is firm; everything else is still a sketch waiting for more votes to fill in.

This profile updates every time you vote, so the sketch becomes a portrait — cast a vote or two on economy or defence next and we'll see whether the housing conviction is part of a wider pattern, or its own quiet exception.