shazam

You want a UK that's careful with money and unsentimental about welfare — you'd restrict PIP eligibility, back an emergency brake on welfare spending, and reject a wealth tax on cash and ISAs. That's a clear, disciplined instinct: the state should be lean where it spends and firm where it enforces. But you're not the caricature of a small-state hardliner — on deforestation rules, flood defence privatisation and electrification you keep breaking left, unwilling to let the market or the climate ledger run unchecked.

You're mostly a majority voter — siding with the national mood on 18 of 22 votes, from keeping the NHS to distrusting a re-join. But your one real divergence is telling: you rejected accelerating electrification when most of the country backed it, the clearest sign that your Brexit-voting, welfare-brake instincts still outrank your environmental sympathies when they collide directly.

You run with a Centre-Right crowd and mostly keep pace — agreeing on roughly six votes in ten. That's loyalty without lockstep: enough overlap to call them your people, enough daylight to suggest you're not just following the herd on welfare and Brexit.

Eleven scored votes is only the opening chapter — the tension between your welfare hawkishness and your environmental streak is the thread worth watching. Keep voting and this read will sharpen into something no dashboard could fake — a fresh cut lands every week.