The case for disclosure carried the vote decisively, yet the best-regarded Yes arguments were not simply demands to publish and move on. Their emphasis was on what the figures could establish—and on the safeguards needed to make them worth trusting.
The floor’s most-respected Yes voice argued that without measurement, “you cannot determine if there is really a problem”; another called for “independent auditing of how nationality is recorded”. Many Yes voters widened the question, pressing for demographic breakdowns across all crime, not just hate crime, and framing disclosure as a matter of public scrutiny.
The No case was less about keeping information from the public than about what its release might do. One of the room’s strongest No voices said figures could be used “to justify their political beliefs and prejudices”; another argued for crime data across several demographics, but asked, “Why does it matter?” if the focus was nationality alone. The disagreement was partly over whether disclosure informs debate or feeds it.
That tension places the vote within the live argument over migration and crime, but the opinions also exposed a question of scope: some Yes voters wanted data to assess policy, while others objected to the category of hate crime itself or called for all offending to be measured alike. The most respected Yes case, notably, paired transparency with explicit warnings against guessing or misclassifying nationality.
The room voted for disclosure; its leading arguments asked for more than disclosure alone.
53 Opinions
And religious status
The only way to have a sensible, mature debate on immigration is to have the facts and the data. Censoring information because you think people can't cope with it is patronizing and dangerous, and will only fuel mistrust and hatred.
No it can only incite more race row issues, only the police should have these statistics not the public.
Good idea, as it may help police to stop profiling certain groups as trouble. Problem being it might increase hate attacks. Trouble with us humans is we have become "it's someone else's fault", attacking certain types of people, as we scapegoat.
It will only be a representation of crimes reported, and more often than not these crimes are not reported.
If we did this, we would just be aligning with many other copy like Denmark. The public has a right to know what percentage of each ethnic group and nationality is committing crimes, especially violent crime. The only reason these figures are being kept secret is because they would increase calls for a ban on immigration for those from the worst offending nations.
Tell me, have you EVER considered a visit to the real world? Every single comment you make, suggests otherwise.
- Non-UK citizens made up 13.1% of people given cautions or convictions in England and Wales in 2024. - Non-UK nationals made up 12.1% of the prison population as of June 2025. Roughly mirroring their share of the overall population. I am only concerned about age & sex in relation to a crime. I would like a robust justice system that works, please and thank you. 😊
If the data is being collected, why is it not being published? What is being hidden and why?
Theres a good reason the government doesn’t release ethnicity crime figures, we all know why that is. The benefits of uncontrolled migration into the UK is a disaster, releasing the data would simply show that the governments uncontrolled immigration policy has failed.