REFNATION
MediaEnds 26 Sept 19h 30m left

Should the BBC television licence fee be replaced with a compulsory £11-a-month charge on household internet bills?

The UK TV licence fee, currently £180 a year from April 2026, funds the BBC but evasion has risen above 12% with only 80% of households paying. A Social Market Foundation report proposes replacing it with a compulsory £11 monthly Home Internet Levy added to fixed broadband bills, raising the same revenue from 95% of households at £132 a year while saving collection costs.

Jump to opinions· 11
Cast your vote81 votes so far

Vote to unlock the result — plus the full breakdown by age, gender, constituency and political leaning.

DocketAlso on today's ballot
Debate

11 Opinions

Sign in and vote to share your opinion.
oldnick52· 111
The Defence-Minded Free-Marketeer
Voted noRight lean

The BBC licence is an anachronism. While there is a need for a Public broadcaster, it should be much reduced and prevented from spending millions on events commercial channels are keen to host. Very few young people watch live TV. Streaming services like Netflix, Amazon and YouTube are now the norm. Personally I don't know anyone that still watches live TV outside a couple of people who are in their 90s. BBC drama should be hived off and funded commercially Live TV is dying!

The Governance Hardliner
Voted noRight lean

Why should I pay a license fee when I don't watch TV or even streaming platforms / YouTube / etc? I can't remember the last time I even looked at something that the BBC touched, its wrong to force me to pay for it

C3Po· 187
The Power Broker
Voted noC. Right lean

The TV license should be scrapped. When was the last time you saw an official new show on the BBC, it's all remakes of old shows and terrible news coverage.

The Peacemaker
Voted yesLeft lean

The BBC does more than provide the UK with TV programmes. Even though I understand the reluctance to pay extra for the internet, particularly if you don't watch or use the BBC, it would be unfair to those who do, to lose it.

Icoult· 102
The Diplomat
Voted noCentre lean

The BBC is respected overall for producing quality content (or should be). But if people don’t value it enough to pay the licence fee then an alternative to the licence fee may be needed or else the BBC budgets need to be constrained. But taxing the internet is not a solution. Internet usage has very little to do with the BBC. Why should the BBC benefit from money that they do little to raise?

Slawomir· 781
The Accountable Capitalist
Voted noRight lean

No more taxes, abolish TV licence sell BBC to highest bidder.

JohnKelly· 112
The Rightward State-Scrutineer
Voted yesRight lean

Any method to properly finance, alongside managerial reform to sort out the current shitshow, would be an improvement on the current situation.

The Early-Days Centre-Right
Voted noC. Right lean

I will not pay the BBC anything till they a neutral

SimonD· 8
The Early-Days Balancer
Voted noC. Right lean

The BBC is currently facing a crisis of legitimacy. The focus should be on restoring professional, impartial coverage as opposed to activist-led content. Restore legitimacy and serve the entire nation, not just the liberal elite., Then we can discuss funding., Otherwise you will jst fuel discontent with the BBC.,

PedroS· 96
The Redistributionist
Voted noLeft lean

No. This would further antagonise anti-bbc people as well as anyone neutral on the issue. Having broadband does not equal watching BBC programmes.