UK law requires imprints on digital political campaign material since November 2023, showing who is behind it. Platforms like Meta and X have separate rules for paid political ads that demand sponsor labelling. Non-advertising content such as independent videos, podcasts and documentaries often lacks mandatory funding disclosure despite growing concerns over undisclosed influence.
Vote to unlock the result — plus the full breakdown by age, gender, constituency and political leaning.
Should politicians face criminal charges for deliberately lying to the public on matters of significant public concern?
Governance · 39 votes · 22h 48m left
Is the UK heading in the wrong direction and needs major policy changes?
Governance · 38 votes · 22h 48m left
Should the UK hold a second referendum on its membership of the European Union?
International · 40 votes · 22h 48m left
Should the UK expand regional airports before building a third runway at Heathrow?
Infrastructure · 37 votes · 22h 48m left
Should 20 mph become the default speed limit on roads through towns and villages in England?
Transport · 38 votes · 22h 48m left
Should the UK stop buying US diesel in response to threats of US export bans and look for alternative supplies?
Energy · 36 votes · 22h 48m left
Should the law prevent the Prime Minister from publicly labelling defendants in ways that risk prejudicing their trial?
Justice · 39 votes · 22h 48m left
5 Opinions
If a creator takes money from dark money lobby groups or foreign front companies to shape elections, the public has a right to see who pays the bills.
This is the only guarantee we have that we aren't being deceived by the ulterior motives of malicious operators. AI should be scrawling content religiously for everything it can highlight as duplicity
Funding doesn't PROVE any quid pro quo. This will lead to some false conclusions. But at least it's a level playing field.
All party finances should be transparent. And public spending too.
Yes. When Twitter added locations, it exposed many fake accounts claiming to be British that were actually in Nigeria, Russia or Iran. This is the 21st century and many countries are propagandising and manipulating us online. Perhaps seeing 'paid for by Putin' would make people stop and think for two seconds about the content they mindlessly consume.