AbiA

You back a wealth tax on the very richest, nationalising British Steel, and reforming social security by fixing jobs and housing rather than cutting cheques — that's your left. But you also want whole-life sentences expanded, Britain's nuclear deterrent kept sovereign, and you voted that wokeness is "killing the UK" — that's your right. You're not confused; you're building a Britain that's generous on money and unsentimental on order.

Last time you were "The Case-by-Case Centrist," a thin record with one flagged break rightward on Gaza. That break has hardened into a pattern: Rights and Defence now sit unanimously right in your record, while Economy has swung strongly left. You haven't drifted — you've clarified.

You ride with the national majority more often than not (28 of 39 recent votes), but your dissents are pointed — you're against the tide on tuition fees, the bus fare cap, and Burnham's fortunes, each time pulling rightward against a leftish or fence-sitting nation.

You run closest with Slawomir, in step on justice and personnel but splitting on health and economy — telling, given economy is your strongest conviction. With ness_c you clash hardest, especially on rights and elections, exactly where you've gone most firmly your own way.

The Rights-Defence-Economy triangle is your signature now — the open question is whether immigration and welfare, still thin in your record, bend the same way or crack it. Vote on, and next week's read will know.

Ten votes in, you're not building an ideology — you're solving problems one at a time. You want cheaper industrial electricity, tighter rules on foreign money in politics, and a student loan system that doesn't punish ambition, but you also want the NHS left alone and Britain out of Brussels for good. That's not incoherence; it's a voter who judges each question on its merits rather than its team.

You sided with the national majority on eight of your ten votes — you said no to rejoining the EU with the 60% who agreed, no to abolishing the NHS with the country's overwhelming consensus, and no to Farage having "gone" with the near-unanimous crowd. Your one real swim against the tide came on Gaza: when a slim national majority backed demanding Hussam Abu Safiya's release, you voted no — the only clearly right-leaning break in an otherwise down-the-middle record.

Hull West and Haltemprice has echoed you almost perfectly, agreeing with you on every recorded vote bar Gaza and Farage — though with just one other local voter recorded each time, this is a hamlet-sized sample, not a verdict on the city.

You've voted on economy, education, elections and foreign policy — one apiece — and nothing at all on welfare, immigration, housing, health, defence or justice. That's a wide, unmarked map for a profile this early; the next dozen votes will do far more to reveal you than the last ten did.

This is day one of watching you think. Cast a few votes on welfare or immigration and we'll see whether that Gaza instinct is a one-off or the edge of something firmer — the picture sharpens every single time you vote.