ArthurJohnson

You want a Britain that taxes wealth harder, nationalises the boring infrastructure of decency — energy, pensions, planning — and doesn't flinch from calling a trillion in one man's hands obscene. Your convictions are sharpest on economy and energy: bank surcharges, corporation tax enforcement, community-owned power, gas-to-electric switching. This is redistribution as engineering, not slogan.

You're rarely the outlier nationally — you rode with the majority on 14 of 19 votes, including the country's near-unanimous calls on lobbying transparency and closing the small-company tax gap. Your real breaks from the crowd are telling: you opposed further NATO-driven defence spending logic even while separately backing the 3.5% commitment, and you sided with the majority against Scottish independence — a leftist instinct for the Union that plenty of your own side wouldn't share.

Here's the sharper story: on nearly every vote, your area's sample is just you, and you're voting net zero, community energy and wealth taxes into a Rutland and Stamford that, if it had spoken, likely wouldn't have joined you. You're not agreeing with your patch so much as outvoting its silence.

You've never voted on welfare, health, justice, or education — the whole apparatus of the state you'd need to fund with those bank surcharges remains untested ground. For someone this clear on tax and energy, that's a conspicuous gap.

Fourteen scored votes is a strong opening chapter, not the whole book — cast a few more on welfare or justice and this profile will start telling you things about yourself you haven't worked out yet. Come back next week; it only gets truer.