DavidBilton

You want a Britain where capital stays out of the state's hands — no wealth caps, no forced pension patriotism, no net-zero mandates handed down to councils. Your own words on the pension fund vote say it plainly: funds exist "for the benefit of the investor not the state." That's the spine here — a market individualist who trusts price signals over politics, backed by a defence-first instinct and a cold eye on foreign entanglements like Israel sanctions.

You're not a reflexive contrarian — you matched the national mood on six of ten votes, rejecting NHS abolition and EU re-entry same as most of the country. But where you break, you break hard: the nation wanted a wealth cap and state-directed pension investment, backed community energy schemes, and you said no to all three, each time on the side of undisturbed private capital.

No local data has come through yet on any of your votes — an early gap, not a verdict. Once your area starts logging opinions, this is where the sharpest contrast to you personally will likely show.

Six scored votes is a start, not a record — welfare, immigration, justice, education and health are all untouched, curious gaps for someone this decided on economics. A hard-right economic identity built without a single welfare or immigration vote is a profile half-drawn.

This is early days, and the picture sharpens with every vote you cast — one more housing or welfare vote could either confirm you as a consistent free-marketeer or reveal more breaks like the planning one. Come back once you've voted a few more times; we'll show you exactly how the shape has changed.